SMITA D/O PURUSHOTTAM PAL @ SMITA W/O BADAL KASHI AND ANOTHER TEKAM BHARAT HIRALAL vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH PSO PS MANAKAPUR NAGPUR AND ANOTHER — APL/1529/2024

Case under Shree Siddhi Vinayak Ganapati Temple Trust (Prabhadevi) Act Section 528. Next hearing: 21st July 2026.

Next hearing 21-Jul-2026

CNR: HCBM040290812024

e-Filing Number

15-10-2024

Filing Number

APL/8614/2024

Filing Date

15-Oct-2024

Registration No

APL/1529/2024

Registration Date

15-Oct-2024

Judge

Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Vrushali V. Joshi

Coram

Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Vrushali V. Joshi

Bench Type

Division

Category

CRIMINAL ( 9 )

Sub-Category

QUASHING OF FIR C.R., CHARGE SHEET OR PROSECUTION ( 26 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal

Last updated 19-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Shree Siddhi Vinayak Ganapati Temple Trust (Prabhadevi) Act Section 528
Indian Penal Code (I.p.c) Section 498-A,294,323,34

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SMITA D/O PURUSHOTTAM PAL @ SMITA W/O BADAL KASHI AND ANOTHER TEKAM BHARAT HIRALAL

  2. 2.POOJA D/O PURUSHOTTAM PAL

    Adv. TEKAM BHARAT HIRALAL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH PSO PS (Police Station) MANAKAPUR NAGPUR AND ANOTHER

    Adv. ADV FOR R 2,DUJENDRA KUMAR H. SHARMA,PRATEEK D. SHARMA,SAYLI V. KULKARNI 1123

  2. 2.KOMAL W/O RISHI PAL

Case History

  1. 21-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 28-Jul-2026

    Applications For Admission After Notice (Criminal Side Matters)

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Pravin S. Patil

  3. 21-Jul-2026

    Applications For Admission After Notice (Criminal Side Matters)

    Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Vrushali V. Joshi

  4. 05-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Vrushali V. JoshiView PDF

    Case Summary: The case was adjourned. The court heard counsel for all parties and noted that the non-applicant's counsel placed documents on record that were not supplied to the applicants. The applicants were granted time to file an additional affidavit, and the matter was stood over after summer vacation for further hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  5. 05-May-2026

    Applications For Admission After Notice (Criminal Side Matters)

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Pravin S. Patil

  6. 16-Feb-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Pravin S. PatilView PDF

  7. 16-Feb-2026

    Applications For Admission After Notice (Criminal Side Matters)

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Pravin S. Patil

  8. 28-Jan-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Pravin S. PatilView PDF

  9. 23-Jan-2026

    For Orders (Criminal Side Matters)-

    Hon'ble Justice Urmila Joshi Phalke , Hon'ble Shri Justice Pravin S. Patil

  10. 04-Dec-2025

    Hon'ble Justice Urmila Joshi Phalke,hon'ble Shri Justice Pravin S. PatilView PDF

  11. 04-Dec-2025

    Applications For Admission - After Notice(criminal Side Matters)

    Hon'ble Justice Urmila Joshi Phalke , Hon'ble Shri Justice Nandesh Shankarrao Deshpande

  12. 15-Oct-2025

    Hon'ble Justice Urmila Joshi Phalke,hon'ble Shri Justice Nandesh Shankarrao DeshpandeView PDF

  13. 14-Oct-2025

    Copy Not Supplied (Criminal Side Matters)

    Hon'ble Justice Urmila Joshi Phalke , Hon'ble Shri Justice Nandesh Shankarrao Deshpande

  14. 08-Oct-2025

    Hon'ble Justice Urmila Joshi Phalke,hon'ble Shri Justice Nandesh Shankarrao DeshpandeView PDF

  15. 19-Dec-2024

    For Admission (Copies Not Supplied)

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Avinash G. Gharote , Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay J. Mantri

  16. 28-Nov-2024

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Avinash G. Gharote,hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay J. MantriView PDF

  17. 28-Nov-2024

    Applications For Admission - After Notice(criminal Side Matters)

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Vinay Joshi , Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay J. Mantri

  18. 24-Oct-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  19. 17-Oct-2024

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Vinay Joshi,hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay J. MantriView PDF

  20. 15-Oct-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. APL/1529/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: The case was adjourned. The court heard counsel for all parties and noted that the non-applicant's counsel placed documents on record that were not supplied to the applicants. The applicants were granted time to file an additional affidavit, and the matter was stood over after summer vacation for further hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case