JAYANT S/O RAMBHAU AUTKAR vs THE STATE OF MAHA., THR. SECRETARY, HEALTH DEPARTMENT, MUMBAI AND ORS — WP/6513/2024

Case under Mah. Civil Services Pension Rules Section 226, 227. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 20th December 2024.

CNR: HCBM040289682024

CASE DISPOSED

Next Hearing

19th November 2024

Filing Number

WP/20385/2024

Filing Date

15-10-2024

Registration No

WP/6513/2024

Registration Date

24-10-2024

Judge

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE NITIN W. SAMBRE , HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE VRUSHALI V. JOSHI

Coram

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE NITIN W. SAMBRE , HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE VRUSHALI V. JOSHI

Bench Type

Division

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

20th December 2024

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Acts & Sections

Mah. Civil Services Pension Rules Section 226, 227

Petitioner(s)

JAYANT S/O RAMBHAU AUTKAR

Adv. VIJAY A KOTHALE,KSHITIJ VIJAY KOTHALE,KSHITIJ VIJAY KOTHALE, ,DEVENDRA P. DAPURKAR,KSHITIJ VIJAY KOTHALE

Respondent(s)

THE STATE OF MAHA., THR. SECRETARY, HEALTH DEPARTMENT, MUMBAI AND ORS

THE ASSISTANAT DIRECTOR OF HEALTH SERVICES (MALERIYA) AKOLA CIRCLE

JOINT DIRECTOR OF HEALTH SERVICES, (MALERIYA AND FILERIYA), PUNE

THE DISTRICT MALERIYA OFFICER, AMRAVATI

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE NITIN W. SAMBRE , HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE VRUSHALI V. JOSHI

19-11-2024
20-12-2024

FRESH ADMISSION (CIVIL SIDE MATTERS)

Orders

15-04-2026
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ANIL S. KILOR,HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAJ D. WAKODE

The High Court of Bombay (Nagpur Bench) granted an extension of time for the Labour Court, Amravati to dispose of Complaint (ULP) No. 27 of 2017, as requested by the Labour Court judge. The petitioner did not appear before the court, while the State was represented by the Additional Government Pleader. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Bombay (Nagpur Bench) granted an extension of time for the Labour Court, Amravati to dispose of Complaint (ULP) No. 27 of 2017, as requested by the Labour Court judge. The petitioner did not appear before the court, while the State was represented by the Additional Government Pleader. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case