RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. CHANDRAPUR THROUGH ITS BRANCH MANGER vs ARJUN LAXMAN GHUGE AND OTHERS Advocate - YASH SUNIL SODHI — CAF/3706/2025
Case under Other Act Section 00. Disposed: --C.A. Disposed off on 05th May 2026.
CNR: HCBM040288432025
Filing Number
CAF/21004/2025
Filing Date
15-Sep-2025
Registration No
CAF/3706/2025
Registration Date
10-Oct-2025
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Yanshivraj Gopichand Khobragade
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Yanshivraj Gopichand Khobragade
Bench Type
Single
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
05-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
--C.A. Disposed off
Last updated 19-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. CHANDRAPUR THROUGH ITS BRANCH MANGER
Adv. HITESH N. VERMA
Respondent(s)
-
1.ARJUN LAXMAN GHUGE AND OTHERS Advocate - YASH SUNIL SODHI
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
05-May-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Yanshivraj Gopichand KhobragadeView PDF
The Bombay High Court (Nagpur Bench) allowed the claimants' legal heirs to withdraw 50% of the Rs. 46,44,307 compensation award (with accrued interest) granted by the MACT for injuries sustained in a 2011 accident, while restricting full withdrawal to protect the insurance company's interests in case of appeal reversal. The court permitted partial withdrawal on furnishing an undertaking to the Registrar, balancing the claimants' financial needs against the insurer's potential recovery rights. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
05-Nov-2025
—
-
15-Sep-2025
Case filed
Registration No. CAF/3706/2025
The Bombay High Court (Nagpur Bench) allowed the claimants' legal heirs to withdraw 50% of the Rs. 46,44,307 compensation award (with accrued interest) granted by the MACT for injuries sustained in a 2011 accident, while restricting full withdrawal to protect the insurance company's interests in case of appeal reversal. The court permitted partial withdrawal on furnishing an undertaking to the Registrar, balancing the claimants' financial needs against the insurer's potential recovery rights. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts