RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. CHANDRAPUR THROUGH ITS BRANCH MANGER vs ARJUN LAXMAN GHUGE AND OTHERS Advocate - YASH SUNIL SODHI — CAF/3706/2025

Case under Other Act Section 00. Disposed: --C.A. Disposed off on 05th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 05-Nov-2025

CNR: HCBM040288432025

Filing Number

CAF/21004/2025

Filing Date

15-Sep-2025

Registration No

CAF/3706/2025

Registration Date

10-Oct-2025

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Yanshivraj Gopichand Khobragade

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Yanshivraj Gopichand Khobragade

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

05-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--C.A. Disposed off

Last updated 19-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Other Act Section 00

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. CHANDRAPUR THROUGH ITS BRANCH MANGER

    Adv. HITESH N. VERMA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.ARJUN LAXMAN GHUGE AND OTHERS Advocate - YASH SUNIL SODHI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 05-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Yanshivraj Gopichand KhobragadeView PDF

    The Bombay High Court (Nagpur Bench) allowed the claimants' legal heirs to withdraw 50% of the Rs. 46,44,307 compensation award (with accrued interest) granted by the MACT for injuries sustained in a 2011 accident, while restricting full withdrawal to protect the insurance company's interests in case of appeal reversal. The court permitted partial withdrawal on furnishing an undertaking to the Registrar, balancing the claimants' financial needs against the insurer's potential recovery rights. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 05-Nov-2025

  4. 15-Sep-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. CAF/3706/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The Bombay High Court (Nagpur Bench) allowed the claimants' legal heirs to withdraw 50% of the Rs. 46,44,307 compensation award (with accrued interest) granted by the MACT for injuries sustained in a 2011 accident, while restricting full withdrawal to protect the insurance company's interests in case of appeal reversal. The court permitted partial withdrawal on furnishing an undertaking to the Registrar, balancing the claimants' financial needs against the insurer's potential recovery rights. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case