THE SOUTH INDIAN BANK LTD., NAGPUR, THR. AUTHORISED OFFICER AND CHIEF MANAGER, MR. VYSAKH JAYAN vs M/S J. S. TRANSPORT CORPORATION, REPRES. BY. ITS PARTNER, BONEY SINGH SIDHU AND OTHERS — WP/5968/2025
Case under Securitisation & Reconstruction of Finiancial Assets Act Section 226,227. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 15th April 2026.
CNR: HCBM040284042025
Next Hearing
23rd October 2025
Filing Number
WP/20688/2025
Filing Date
11-09-2025
Registration No
WP/5968/2025
Registration Date
06-10-2025
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ANIL S. KILOR , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAJ D. WAKODE
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ANIL S. KILOR , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAJ D. WAKODE
Bench Type
Division
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
15th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
THE SOUTH INDIAN BANK LTD., NAGPUR, THR. AUTHORISED OFFICER AND CHIEF MANAGER, MR. VYSAKH JAYAN
Adv. S.N. KUMAR,VAIBHAV V. SALAR,VAIBHAV V. SALAR, ,PRATIK P. JOSHI,PRUTHA MAHESH MASODKAR,VAIBHAV V. SALAR
Respondent(s)
M/S J. S. TRANSPORT CORPORATION, REPRES. BY. ITS PARTNER, BONEY SINGH SIDHU AND OTHERS
Adv. ,PRAJAKTA BADGE,RAYHAAN SAMEER AHMED,SHAMISH AGRAWAL,RADHESHYAM H. AGRAWAL 1123
MR. BONEY SINGH SUDHU
MR. HARI SINGH SIDHU @ HARISINGH H. SINDHU
MR. TONEY HARBANS SINGH SIDHU
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ANIL S. KILOR , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAJ D. WAKODE
FOR ADMISSION - (CIVIL SIDE MATTERS)
FOR ADMISSION - (CIVIL SIDE MATTERS)
CONTINUE ADMISSION MATTERS
FOR ADMISSION - (CIVIL SIDE MATTERS)
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 23-10-2025 | |
| 15-04-2026 | FOR ADMISSION - (CIVIL SIDE MATTERS) |
| 25-03-2026 | FOR ADMISSION - (CIVIL SIDE MATTERS) |
| 11-03-2026 | CONTINUE ADMISSION MATTERS |
| 24-02-2026 | FOR ADMISSION - (CIVIL SIDE MATTERS) |
Orders
CASE SUMMARY The Bombay High Court (Nagpur Bench) allowed South Indian Bank's writ petition and quashed the lower court's order rejecting the bank's Section 14 application under the SARFAESI Act, 2002. The lower court had rejected the bank's second application for possession of secured assets, reasoning that an existing possession warrant from an earlier application precluded a subsequent application for the same borrower. The High Court held that a secured creditor can file multiple Section 14 applications for different loan transactions or properties, rejecting the argument that only one application is permissible per borrower. The court also found no interim moratorium applied from NCLT proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
CASE SUMMARY The Bombay High Court (Nagpur Bench) allowed South Indian Bank's writ petition and quashed the lower court's order rejecting the bank's Section 14 application under the SARFAESI Act, 2002. The lower court had rejected the bank's second application for possession of secured assets, reasoning that an existing possession warrant from an earlier application precluded a subsequent application for the same borrower. The High Court held that a secured creditor can file multiple Section 14 applications for different loan transactions or properties, rejecting the argument that only one application is permissible per borrower. The court also found no interim moratorium applied from NCLT proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts