THE SOUTH INDIAN BANK LTD., NAGPUR, THR. AUTHORISED OFFICER AND CHIEF MANAGER, MR. VYSAKH JAYAN vs M/S J. S. TRANSPORT CORPORATION, REPRES. BY. ITS PARTNER, BONEY SINGH SIDHU AND OTHERS — WP/5968/2025

Case under Securitisation & Reconstruction of Finiancial Assets Act Section 226,227. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 15th April 2026.

CNR: HCBM040284042025

CASE DISPOSED

Next Hearing

23rd October 2025

Filing Number

WP/20688/2025

Filing Date

11-09-2025

Registration No

WP/5968/2025

Registration Date

06-10-2025

Judge

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ANIL S. KILOR , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAJ D. WAKODE

Coram

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ANIL S. KILOR , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAJ D. WAKODE

Bench Type

Division

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

15th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Acts & Sections

Securitisation & Reconstruction of Finiancial Assets Act Section 226,227
Constitution of India

Petitioner(s)

THE SOUTH INDIAN BANK LTD., NAGPUR, THR. AUTHORISED OFFICER AND CHIEF MANAGER, MR. VYSAKH JAYAN

Adv. S.N. KUMAR,VAIBHAV V. SALAR,VAIBHAV V. SALAR, ,PRATIK P. JOSHI,PRUTHA MAHESH MASODKAR,VAIBHAV V. SALAR

Respondent(s)

M/S J. S. TRANSPORT CORPORATION, REPRES. BY. ITS PARTNER, BONEY SINGH SIDHU AND OTHERS

Adv. ,PRAJAKTA BADGE,RAYHAAN SAMEER AHMED,SHAMISH AGRAWAL,RADHESHYAM H. AGRAWAL 1123

MR. BONEY SINGH SUDHU

MR. HARI SINGH SIDHU @ HARISINGH H. SINDHU

MR. TONEY HARBANS SINGH SIDHU

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ANIL S. KILOR , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAJ D. WAKODE

23-10-2025
15-04-2026

FOR ADMISSION - (CIVIL SIDE MATTERS)

25-03-2026

FOR ADMISSION - (CIVIL SIDE MATTERS)

11-03-2026

CONTINUE ADMISSION MATTERS

24-02-2026

FOR ADMISSION - (CIVIL SIDE MATTERS)

Orders

15-04-2026
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ANIL S. KILOR,HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAJ D. WAKODE

CASE SUMMARY The Bombay High Court (Nagpur Bench) allowed South Indian Bank's writ petition and quashed the lower court's order rejecting the bank's Section 14 application under the SARFAESI Act, 2002. The lower court had rejected the bank's second application for possession of secured assets, reasoning that an existing possession warrant from an earlier application precluded a subsequent application for the same borrower. The High Court held that a secured creditor can file multiple Section 14 applications for different loan transactions or properties, rejecting the argument that only one application is permissible per borrower. The court also found no interim moratorium applied from NCLT proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

CASE SUMMARY The Bombay High Court (Nagpur Bench) allowed South Indian Bank's writ petition and quashed the lower court's order rejecting the bank's Section 14 application under the SARFAESI Act, 2002. The lower court had rejected the bank's second application for possession of secured assets, reasoning that an existing possession warrant from an earlier application precluded a subsequent application for the same borrower. The High Court held that a secured creditor can file multiple Section 14 applications for different loan transactions or properties, rejecting the argument that only one application is permissible per borrower. The court also found no interim moratorium applied from NCLT proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case