THE DIVISIONAL CONTROLLER, MAHA. STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, NAGPUR vs SMT. PRIYANKA WD/O MAHESH NIMJE AND OTHERS Advocate - MONALI HEMRAJ PATHADE, (FOR R/1 TO R/ — FA/293/2026
Case under Motor Vehicles Act,1939 Section 173. Next hearing: 12th May 2026.
CNR: HCBM040275002025
Next Hearing
12th May 2026
Filing Number
FA/20009/2025
Filing Date
04-09-2025
Registration No
FA/293/2026
Registration Date
24-04-2026
Bench Type
Single
Category
COMPENSATION ( 7 )
Sub-Category
OTHERS ( 99 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
THE DIVISIONAL CONTROLLER, MAHA. STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, NAGPUR
Adv. VIVEK HARIBHAU KEDAR
Respondent(s)
SMT. PRIYANKA WD/O MAHESH NIMJE AND OTHERS Advocate - MONALI HEMRAJ PATHADE, (FOR R/1 TO R/
,MADAN D. BONDREY( (FOR R/1 TO R/
MASTER DEVANSHU S/O. MAHESH NIMJE (MINOR) THR. NATURAL GUARDIAN MOTHER PRIYANKA WD/O. MAHESH NIMJE
HRI. NAMDEO S/O. NARAYAN NIMJE
SMT. SHANTA W/O. NAMDEO NIMJE
Hearing History
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 12-05-2026 |
Orders
Summary: MSRTC Nagpur v. Smt. Priyanka and Others (CAF 3242/2025) The High Court of Bombay, Nagpur Bench, allowed MSRTC's application to condone a 55-day delay in filing its appeal against a Motor Accident Claims Tribunal award of Rs. 39,98,680/- compensation (with 7.5% interest) for the death of Mahesh Nimje in a bus accident. The appeal was admitted and registered. Simultaneously, the court permitted the claimants to withdraw 50% of their compensation shares, conditioned on furnishing a surety/undertaking to re-deposit the withdrawn amount within two months if MSRTC succeeds in its appeal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: MSRTC Nagpur v. Smt. Priyanka and Others (CAF 3242/2025) The High Court of Bombay, Nagpur Bench, allowed MSRTC's application to condone a 55-day delay in filing its appeal against a Motor Accident Claims Tribunal award of Rs. 39,98,680/- compensation (with 7.5% interest) for the death of Mahesh Nimje in a bus accident. The appeal was admitted and registered. Simultaneously, the court permitted the claimants to withdraw 50% of their compensation shares, conditioned on furnishing a surety/undertaking to re-deposit the withdrawn amount within two months if MSRTC succeeds in its appeal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts