V.I.D.C., THR. ITS EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, AMRAVATI PROJECT CONSTRUCTION DIVISION, AMRAVATI vs SUKHADEO BALIRAM BAGADE AND OTHERS — CAF/654/2025

Case under Limitation Act,1963 Section 05. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 24th March 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 06-Mar-2025

CNR: HCBM040274742024

Filing Number

CAF/19297/2024

Filing Date

01-Oct-2024

Registration No

CAF/654/2025

Registration Date

24-Feb-2025

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Raj D. Wakode

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Raj D. Wakode

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

24-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 08-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Limitation Act,1963 Section 05

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.V.I.D.C., THR. ITS EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, AMRAVATI PROJECT CONSTRUCTION DIVISION, AMRAVATI

    Adv. UDAY ARUN GOSAVI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SUKHADEO BALIRAM BAGADE AND OTHERS

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 24-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Raj D. WakodeView PDF

    Summary The Bombay High Court (Nagpur Bench) allowed V.I.D.C.'s application to condone an 11-day delay in filing a First Appeal against a land acquisition judgment dated 02.07.2024, finding the delay was bonafide and resulted from necessary administrative procedures including consultation with the Chief Law Officer. The court also granted a stay of the impugned judgment during appeal proceedings, conditional upon V.I.D.C. depositing the entire decretal amount with interest within 12 weeks, with failure to comply resulting in stay revocation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-Mar-2025

    —

  4. 01-Oct-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. CAF/654/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Bombay High Court (Nagpur Bench) allowed V.I.D.C.'s application to condone an 11-day delay in filing a First Appeal against a land acquisition judgment dated 02.07.2024, finding the delay was bonafide and resulted from necessary administrative procedures including consultation with the Chief Law Officer. The court also granted a stay of the impugned judgment during appeal proceedings, conditional upon V.I.D.C. depositing the entire decretal amount with interest within 12 weeks, with failure to comply resulting in stay revocation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case