V.I.D.C., THR. ITS EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, AMRAVATI PROJECT CONSTRUCTION DIVISION, AMRAVATI vs SUKHADEO BALIRAM BAGADE AND OTHERS — CAF/655/2025

Case under Other Act Section 41RULE05. Disposed: Contested--C.A. Disposed off on 24th March 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 06-Mar-2025

CNR: HCBM040274722024

Filing Number

CAF/19296/2024

Filing Date

01-Oct-2024

Registration No

CAF/655/2025

Registration Date

24-Feb-2025

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Raj D. Wakode

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Raj D. Wakode

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

24-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--C.A. Disposed off

Last updated 08-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Other Act Section 41RULE05

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.V.I.D.C., THR. ITS EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, AMRAVATI PROJECT CONSTRUCTION DIVISION, AMRAVATI

    Adv. UDAY ARUN GOSAVI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SUKHADEO BALIRAM BAGADE AND OTHERS

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 24-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Raj D. WakodeView PDF

    Summary The Bombay High Court (Nagpur Bench) allowed V.I.D.C.'s application to condone an 11-day delay in filing a First Appeal against a land acquisition judgment, finding the delay was bonafide and resulted from legitimate administrative procedures including obtaining Chief Law Officer's opinion and arranging court fees. The court also granted a stay of the impugned judgment during appeal pendency, conditioned on V.I.D.C. depositing the entire decretal amount with interest within 12 weeks, with failure resulting in stay revocation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-Mar-2025

    —

  4. 01-Oct-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. CAF/655/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Bombay High Court (Nagpur Bench) allowed V.I.D.C.'s application to condone an 11-day delay in filing a First Appeal against a land acquisition judgment, finding the delay was bonafide and resulted from legitimate administrative procedures including obtaining Chief Law Officer's opinion and arranging court fees. The court also granted a stay of the impugned judgment during appeal pendency, conditioned on V.I.D.C. depositing the entire decretal amount with interest within 12 weeks, with failure resulting in stay revocation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case