DYANESHWAR RAMBHAU MANDEKAR vs ZILLA PARISHAD, AKOLA THR. ITS CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND ORS. — WP/6637/2023
Case under Service Matter Section 226. Next hearing: 08th May 2026.
CNR: HCBM040271992023
Next Hearing
08th May 2026
Filing Number
WP/19286/2023
Filing Date
25-09-2023
Registration No
WP/6637/2023
Registration Date
29-09-2023
Judge
HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE M. S. JAWALKAR , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE NANDESH SHANKARRAO DESHPANDE
Coram
HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE M. S. JAWALKAR , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE NANDESH SHANKARRAO DESHPANDE
Bench Type
Division
Category
APPOINTMENT OF CONSTITUTIONAL FUNCTIONARIES ( 3 )
Sub-Category
OTHERS ( 99 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
DYANESHWAR RAMBHAU MANDEKAR
Adv. ANUP SHANKAR DHORE,YASH SANJAY BANGALE,YASH SANJAY BANGALE, ,KARAN DEEPAK BHENDE,YASH SANJAY BANGALE
Respondent(s)
ZILLA PARISHAD, AKOLA THR. ITS CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND ORS.
Adv. ,ANKUSH M. TIRUKH 1123
EDUCATION OFFICER (PRIMARY), ZILLA PARISHAD, AKOLA
DEPUTY CHIEF ACCOUNTS AND FINANCE OFFICER, ZILLA PARISHAD, AKOLA
BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, PANCHAYAT SAMITI, BARSHITAKLI, AKOLA
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE M. S. JAWALKAR , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE NANDESH SHANKARRAO DESHPANDE
FRESH ADMISSION (CIVIL SIDE MATTERS)
FOR ADMISSION-SERVICE MATTERS
FOR ADMISSION-SERVICE MATTERS
FOR ADMISSION - CIRCULATED MATTERS (CIVIL SIDE MATTERS)
FOR ORDERS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-10-2023 | FRESH ADMISSION (CIVIL SIDE MATTERS) |
| 30-01-2026 | FOR ADMISSION-SERVICE MATTERS |
| 14-01-2026 | FOR ADMISSION-SERVICE MATTERS |
| 04-09-2024 | FOR ADMISSION - CIRCULATED MATTERS (CIVIL SIDE MATTERS) |
| 08-03-2024 | FOR ORDERS |
Orders
Case Summary: WP/6637/2023 Outcome: Petition allowed. The Nagpur Bench of Bombay High Court quashed recovery orders dated 01.06.2023 and 22.06.2023 directing deduction of Rs. 2,04,542 from retired teacher Dnyaneshwar Mandekar's gratuity for alleged excess payments. The court ordered respondents to return any deducted amount within four weeks and pay full gratuity/retiral benefits without deductions. Key Finding: Recovery was impermissible under Supreme Court precedent because: (1) petitioner was Class III employee; (2) petitioner had already retired; (3) excess payment allegedly made 7+ years prior to recovery order; and (4) no fraud/misrepresentation by petitioner established. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: WP/6637/2023 Outcome: Petition allowed. The Nagpur Bench of Bombay High Court quashed recovery orders dated 01.06.2023 and 22.06.2023 directing deduction of Rs. 2,04,542 from retired teacher Dnyaneshwar Mandekar's gratuity for alleged excess payments. The court ordered respondents to return any deducted amount within four weeks and pay full gratuity/retiral benefits without deductions. Key Finding: Recovery was impermissible under Supreme Court precedent because: (1) petitioner was Class III employee; (2) petitioner had already retired; (3) excess payment allegedly made 7+ years prior to recovery order; and (4) no fraud/misrepresentation by petitioner established. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts