STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THR. ADDL. SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF INDUSTRIES, POWER AND LABOUR DEPT., AND ORS vs MANOHAR LAXMANRAO NIRATKAR AND OTHERS — WP/5846/2025

Case under Constitution of India Section 226,227. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 28th April 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 14-Oct-2025

CNR: HCBM040268982025

e-Filing Number

22-08-2025

Filing Number

WP/19585/2025

Filing Date

26-Aug-2025

Registration No

WP/5846/2025

Registration Date

30-Sep-2025

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil S. Kilor , Hon'ble Shri Justice Raj D. Wakode

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil S. Kilor , Hon'ble Shri Justice Raj D. Wakode

Bench Type

Division

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

28-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 28-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226,227
Administrative Tribunal Act
Mah. Civil Services Pension Rules

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THR. ADDL. SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF INDUSTRIES, POWER AND LABOUR DEPT., AND ORS

    Adv. GOVERNMENT PLEADER

  2. 2.THE DIRECTOR, GOVERNMENT PRINTING AND STATIONERY, MUMBAI

  3. 3.THE MANAGER, GOVERNMENT PRESS AND BOOK DEPOT, NAGPUR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MANOHAR LAXMANRAO NIRATKAR AND OTHERS

    Adv. ,SHUBHANKAR S. PHADNIS,NARAYAN CHANDRASHEKHAR PHADNIS,(FOR R 1 TO

  2. 2.,SHUBHANKAR S. PHADNIS,NARAYAN CHANDRASHEKHAR PHADNIS,(FOR LRS. OF

  3. 3.,NARAYAN CHANDRASHEKHAR PHADNIS 1123

  4. 4.GIRISH RAMCHANDRA JOGLEKAR

  5. 5.SANJAY HARISHCHANDRA GANVEER

  6. 6.VIJAY MAROTRAO WAKODE

  7. 7.RAJENDRA KRUSHNARAO PATHADE

  8. 8.ANIL MAROTRAO GODE

  9. 9.KEWALKISHOR RUPCHAND MESHRAM

  10. 10.ARUN WAMANRAO MOTGHARE

  11. 11.GANESH SUBBARAO NAIDU

  12. 12.NARENDRA SUKHDEORAO KUKDE

  13. 13.SHIVNATH SOMAJI BHUTE

  14. 14.VIKAS BAKSHI SELOKAR

  15. 15.MAHENDRA MANIRAM HADKE

  16. 16.GAJANAN JANARDAN LABHE

  17. 17.PRADIP GOPALRAO THOMBRE

  18. 18.DURGASHANKAR DEVRAO DAKHOLE

  19. 19.BHALCHANDRA VITHOBA BHIVGADE

  20. 20.MALIK ABDUL SAMAD

  21. 21.RAMKUSAN KEWALRAM BHOYAR

  22. 22.DILIP RAMCHANDRARAO CHAVAKE

  23. 23.VILAS GULABRAO CHANDURKAR

  24. 24.ANIL GANPATRAO KUNTE

  25. 25.RATNAKAR BALKRUSHNA DAMLE

  26. 26.SUDHIR UDDHAORAO BHONGADE

  27. 27.VIJAYKUMAR MADHAVRAO BADWAIK

  28. 28.GANESH GANPATRAO YELKAR

  29. 29.MILIND RAMAJI RAMTEKE

  30. 30.RAJESH GULABRAO MANDAVGADE

  31. 31.DHANANJAY BABANRAO KADU

  32. 32.CHANDRASHEKHAR GAJANANRAO BHATKULKAR

  33. 33.ANIL VASANTRAO MANEKAR

  34. 34.SUNIL MAHADEORAO DEULKAR

  35. 35.ARUN TUKARAMJI GHUSE

  36. 36.DINESH GOPICHAND MASRAM

  37. 37.PRAKASH VISHWANATH ZALKE

  38. 38.SANJAY CHINTAMAN MUNGHATE

  39. 39.ASHOK RAMCHANDRA SONULE

  40. 40.TEJRAO NARAYANRAO MOHOD

  41. 41.KAWALU MAHADEO TICHKULE

  42. 42.SAHEBRAO BALWANTRAO MORE

  43. 43.NATTHU VASUDEO TAMBE (DEAD), THR. HIS WIDOW SMT. ASHA NATTHU TAMBE

  44. 44.RAJENDRA NATTHUJI FALE (DEAD), THR. HIS WIDOW SMT. SUREKHA RAJENDRA FALE

  45. 45.DHARMENDRA MANIKRAO GAIKWAD (DEAD), THR. WIDOW SMT. VAISHALI DHARMENDRA GAIKWAD

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 28-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil S. Kilor,hon'ble Shri Justice Raj D. WakodeView PDF

    Case Summary: WP/5846/2025 The High Court of Bombay (Nagpur Bench) disposed of the State of Maharashtra's writ petition with liberty to approach the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal. The State argued that crucial issues regarding respondents' entitlement to time-bound promotion and limitation points raised in an additional affidavit were not addressed by the Tribunal. The Court held that when specific points remain undecided by the Tribunal, the proper remedy is to return to the Tribunal for adjudication on those issues rather than seek relief in writ jurisdiction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 28-Apr-2026

    For Admission-Service Matters Arising Out Of Order Of Tribunals

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil S. Kilor , Hon'ble Shri Justice Raj D. Wakode

  4. 27-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil S. Kilor,hon'ble Shri Justice Raj D. WakodeView PDF

  5. 23-Apr-2026

    For Admission-Service Matters Arising Out Of Order Of Tribunals

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil S. Kilor , Hon'ble Shri Justice Raj D. Wakode

  6. 17-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil S. Kilor,hon'ble Shri Justice Raj D. WakodeView PDF

  7. 06-Apr-2026

    For Admission-Service Matters Arising Out Of Order Of Tribunals

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil S. Kilor , Hon'ble Shri Justice Raj D. Wakode

  8. 11-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil S. Kilor,hon'ble Shri Justice Raj D. WakodeView PDF

  9. 18-Feb-2026

    For Admission-Service Matters Arising Out Of Order Of Tribunals

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil S. Kilor , Hon'ble Shri Justice Raj D. Wakode

  10. 11-Feb-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil S. Kilor,hon'ble Shri Justice Raj D. WakodeView PDF

  11. 23-Jan-2026

    For Admission-Service Matters Arising Out Of Order Of Tribunals

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil S. Kilor , Hon'ble Shri Justice Raj D. Wakode

  12. 09-Jan-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil S. Kilor,hon'ble Shri Justice Raj D. WakodeView PDF

  13. 09-Jan-2026

    Fresh Admission-Service Matters Arising Out Of Order Of Tribunals

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil S. Kilor , Hon'ble Shri Justice Rajnish R. Vyas

  14. 17-Oct-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil S. Kilor,hon'ble Shri Justice Rajnish R. VyasView PDF

  15. 14-Oct-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  16. 26-Aug-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/5846/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WP/5846/2025 The High Court of Bombay (Nagpur Bench) disposed of the State of Maharashtra's writ petition with liberty to approach the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal. The State argued that crucial issues regarding respondents' entitlement to time-bound promotion and limitation points raised in an additional affidavit were not addressed by the Tribunal. The Court held that when specific points remain undecided by the Tribunal, the proper remedy is to return to the Tribunal for adjudication on those issues rather than seek relief in writ jurisdiction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case