STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THR. ADDL. SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF INDUSTRIES, POWER AND LABOUR DEPT., AND ORS vs MANOHAR LAXMANRAO NIRATKAR AND OTHERS — WP/5846/2025
Case under Constitution of India Section 226,227. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 28th April 2026.
CNR: HCBM040268982025
Next Hearing
14th October 2025
e-Filing Number
22-08-2025
Filing Number
WP/19585/2025
Filing Date
26-08-2025
Registration No
WP/5846/2025
Registration Date
30-09-2025
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ANIL S. KILOR , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAJ D. WAKODE
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ANIL S. KILOR , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAJ D. WAKODE
Bench Type
Division
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
28th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED OFF
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THR. ADDL. SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF INDUSTRIES, POWER AND LABOUR DEPT., AND ORS
Adv. GOVERNMENT PLEADER
THE DIRECTOR, GOVERNMENT PRINTING AND STATIONERY, MUMBAI
THE MANAGER, GOVERNMENT PRESS AND BOOK DEPOT, NAGPUR
Respondent(s)
MANOHAR LAXMANRAO NIRATKAR AND OTHERS
Adv. ,SHUBHANKAR S. PHADNIS,NARAYAN CHANDRASHEKHAR PHADNIS,(FOR R 1 TO
,SHUBHANKAR S. PHADNIS,NARAYAN CHANDRASHEKHAR PHADNIS,(FOR LRS. OF
,NARAYAN CHANDRASHEKHAR PHADNIS 1123
GIRISH RAMCHANDRA JOGLEKAR
SANJAY HARISHCHANDRA GANVEER
VIJAY MAROTRAO WAKODE
RAJENDRA KRUSHNARAO PATHADE
ANIL MAROTRAO GODE
KEWALKISHOR RUPCHAND MESHRAM
ARUN WAMANRAO MOTGHARE
GANESH SUBBARAO NAIDU
NARENDRA SUKHDEORAO KUKDE
SHIVNATH SOMAJI BHUTE
VIKAS BAKSHI SELOKAR
MAHENDRA MANIRAM HADKE
GAJANAN JANARDAN LABHE
PRADIP GOPALRAO THOMBRE
DURGASHANKAR DEVRAO DAKHOLE
BHALCHANDRA VITHOBA BHIVGADE
MALIK ABDUL SAMAD
RAMKUSAN KEWALRAM BHOYAR
DILIP RAMCHANDRARAO CHAVAKE
VILAS GULABRAO CHANDURKAR
ANIL GANPATRAO KUNTE
RATNAKAR BALKRUSHNA DAMLE
SUDHIR UDDHAORAO BHONGADE
VIJAYKUMAR MADHAVRAO BADWAIK
GANESH GANPATRAO YELKAR
MILIND RAMAJI RAMTEKE
RAJESH GULABRAO MANDAVGADE
DHANANJAY BABANRAO KADU
CHANDRASHEKHAR GAJANANRAO BHATKULKAR
ANIL VASANTRAO MANEKAR
SUNIL MAHADEORAO DEULKAR
ARUN TUKARAMJI GHUSE
DINESH GOPICHAND MASRAM
PRAKASH VISHWANATH ZALKE
SANJAY CHINTAMAN MUNGHATE
ASHOK RAMCHANDRA SONULE
TEJRAO NARAYANRAO MOHOD
KAWALU MAHADEO TICHKULE
SAHEBRAO BALWANTRAO MORE
NATTHU VASUDEO TAMBE (DEAD), THR. HIS WIDOW SMT. ASHA NATTHU TAMBE
RAJENDRA NATTHUJI FALE (DEAD), THR. HIS WIDOW SMT. SUREKHA RAJENDRA FALE
DHARMENDRA MANIKRAO GAIKWAD (DEAD), THR. WIDOW SMT. VAISHALI DHARMENDRA GAIKWAD
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ANIL S. KILOR , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAJ D. WAKODE
FOR ADMISSION-SERVICE MATTERS ARISING OUT OF ORDER OF TRIBUNALS
FOR ADMISSION-SERVICE MATTERS ARISING OUT OF ORDER OF TRIBUNALS
FOR ADMISSION-SERVICE MATTERS ARISING OUT OF ORDER OF TRIBUNALS
FOR ADMISSION-SERVICE MATTERS ARISING OUT OF ORDER OF TRIBUNALS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 14-10-2025 | |
| 28-04-2026 | FOR ADMISSION-SERVICE MATTERS ARISING OUT OF ORDER OF TRIBUNALS |
| 23-04-2026 | FOR ADMISSION-SERVICE MATTERS ARISING OUT OF ORDER OF TRIBUNALS |
| 06-04-2026 | FOR ADMISSION-SERVICE MATTERS ARISING OUT OF ORDER OF TRIBUNALS |
| 18-02-2026 | FOR ADMISSION-SERVICE MATTERS ARISING OUT OF ORDER OF TRIBUNALS |
Orders
Case Summary: WP/5846/2025 The High Court of Bombay (Nagpur Bench) disposed of the State of Maharashtra's writ petition with liberty to approach the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal. The State argued that crucial issues regarding respondents' entitlement to time-bound promotion and limitation points raised in an additional affidavit were not addressed by the Tribunal. The Court held that when specific points remain undecided by the Tribunal, the proper remedy is to return to the Tribunal for adjudication on those issues rather than seek relief in writ jurisdiction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: WP/5846/2025 The High Court of Bombay (Nagpur Bench) disposed of the State of Maharashtra's writ petition with liberty to approach the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal. The State argued that crucial issues regarding respondents' entitlement to time-bound promotion and limitation points raised in an additional affidavit were not addressed by the Tribunal. The Court held that when specific points remain undecided by the Tribunal, the proper remedy is to return to the Tribunal for adjudication on those issues rather than seek relief in writ jurisdiction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts