SAYYAD AMIN SAYYAD SALAUDDIN vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THROUGH ITS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF IRRIGATION, MUMBAI AND ANOTHER Advocate - PURUSHOTTAM PATIL, (FOR R — WP/7811/2018

Case under Project Affected Persons Rehabilitation Act Section U/A226. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 30th March 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 18-Mar-2021

CNR: HCBM040267082018

Filing Number

WP/19936/2018

Filing Date

29-Aug-2018

Registration No

WP/7811/2018

Registration Date

15-Nov-2018

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil L. Pansare , Hon'ble Justice Nivedita Prakash Mehta

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil L. Pansare , Hon'ble Justice Nivedita Prakash Mehta

Bench Type

Division

Category

LAND ACQUISITION/REQUISITION(CENTRAL/STATE) ( 20 )

Sub-Category

OTHERS ( 99 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

30-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 08-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Project Affected Persons Rehabilitation Act Section U/A226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SAYYAD AMIN SAYYAD SALAUDDIN

    Adv. S. W. DESHPANDE,ASHOK P. KHADATKAR,ASHOK P. KHADATKAR, ,ASHOK P. KHADATKAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THROUGH ITS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF IRRIGATION, MUMBAI AND ANOTHER Advocate - PURUSHOTTAM PATIL, (FOR R

  2. 2.TAPI PATBANDHARE VIKAS MAHAMANDAL, THR. PRE. PARYAWARAN VISHAYAK LOKASUNAWANI SAMITI and DY. COLLEC

    Adv. (FOR R

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 30-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil L. Pansare,hon'ble Justice Nivedita Prakash MehtaView PDF

    Case Summary The Bombay High Court (Nagpur Bench) dismissed 83 consolidated writ petitions filed by land owners seeking enhanced compensation for lands acquired under the "Kurha Wadhoda Islampur Upsa Sinchan Yojana" project. The petitioners argued they were entitled to parity with similarly situated owners who received higher compensation in subsequent transactions. However, the court held that the cited Supreme Court judgment in *Daulat Sitaram Kodone* was inapplicable to their factually distinct case and that subsequent price increases were justified by government regulations. The court also imposed costs of Rs. 5,000 each on the petitioners for attempting to mislead the court by suppressing information about an identical coordinate bench decision that had already rejected their claims. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 30-Mar-2026

    Fresh Admission-Prioritised Cases/Old Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil L. Pansare , Hon'ble Justice Nivedita Prakash Mehta

  4. 24-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil L. Pansare,hon'ble Justice Nivedita Prakash MehtaView PDF

  5. 18-Mar-2021

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 29-Aug-2018

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/7811/2018

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary The Bombay High Court (Nagpur Bench) dismissed 83 consolidated writ petitions filed by land owners seeking enhanced compensation for lands acquired under the "Kurha Wadhoda Islampur Upsa Sinchan Yojana" project. The petitioners argued they were entitled to parity with similarly situated owners who received higher compensation in subsequent transactions. However, the court held that the cited Supreme Court judgment in *Daulat Sitaram Kodone* was inapplicable to their factually distinct case and that subsequent price increases were justified by government regulations. The court also imposed costs of Rs. 5,000 each on the petitioners for attempting to mislead the court by suppressing information about an identical coordinate bench decision that had already rejected their claims. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case