BHIMRAO S/O SHESHRAO SOLANKE vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THROUGH ITS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF IRRIGATION, MUMBAI AND ANOTHER Advocate - PURUSHOTTAM PATIL, (FOR R — WP/7800/2018

Case under Project Affected Persons Rehabilitation Act Section U/A226. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 30th March 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 19-Mar-2021

CNR: HCBM040266572018

Filing Number

WP/19889/2018

Filing Date

29-Aug-2018

Registration No

WP/7800/2018

Registration Date

15-Nov-2018

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil L. Pansare , Hon'ble Justice Nivedita Prakash Mehta

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil L. Pansare , Hon'ble Justice Nivedita Prakash Mehta

Bench Type

Division

Category

LAND ACQUISITION/REQUISITION(CENTRAL/STATE) ( 20 )

Sub-Category

OTHERS ( 99 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

30-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 08-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Project Affected Persons Rehabilitation Act Section U/A226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.BHIMRAO S/O SHESHRAO SOLANKE

    Adv. S. W. DESHPANDE,ASHOK P. KHADATKAR,ASHOK P. KHADATKAR, ,ASHOK P. KHADATKAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THROUGH ITS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF IRRIGATION, MUMBAI AND ANOTHER Advocate - PURUSHOTTAM PATIL, (FOR R

  2. 2.,PURUSHOTTAM PATIL,(FOR R

  3. 3.TAPI PATBANDHARE VIKAS MAHAMANDAL, THR. PRE. PARYAWARAN VISHAYAK LOKASUNAWANI SAMITI and DY. COLLEC

    Adv. (FOR R

  4. 4.PURUSHOTTAM PATIL (FOR R

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 30-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil L. Pansare,hon'ble Justice Nivedita Prakash MehtaView PDF

    Summary The High Court of Bombay (Nagpur Bench) dismissed 84 consolidated writ petitions seeking enhanced compensation for land acquired under the Kurha Wadhoda Islampur Upsa Sinchan Yojana project. The petitioners claimed entitlement to higher compensation on parity with later land acquisitions for the same project; however, the court found that a coordinate bench had already rejected identical claims in similar cases (WP No. 5133/2019), and the cited Supreme Court judgment was factually inapplicable. The court further censured petitioners' counsel for suppressing this prior adverse ruling and attempting to mislead the court, dismissing all petitions with costs of Rs. 5,000 each. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 30-Mar-2026

    Fresh Admission-Prioritised Cases/Old Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil L. Pansare , Hon'ble Justice Nivedita Prakash Mehta

  4. 24-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil L. Pansare,hon'ble Justice Nivedita Prakash MehtaView PDF

  5. 19-Mar-2021

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 29-Aug-2018

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/7800/2018

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The High Court of Bombay (Nagpur Bench) dismissed 84 consolidated writ petitions seeking enhanced compensation for land acquired under the Kurha Wadhoda Islampur Upsa Sinchan Yojana project. The petitioners claimed entitlement to higher compensation on parity with later land acquisitions for the same project; however, the court found that a coordinate bench had already rejected identical claims in similar cases (WP No. 5133/2019), and the cited Supreme Court judgment was factually inapplicable. The court further censured petitioners' counsel for suppressing this prior adverse ruling and attempting to mislead the court, dismissing all petitions with costs of Rs. 5,000 each. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case