RAMLAL S/O DAULAT ALKARI (RAJPUT) vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THROUGH ITS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF IRRIGATION, MUMBAI AND ANOTHER Advocate - PURUSHOTTAM PATIL, (FOR R — WP/7797/2018

Case under Project Affected Persons Rehabilitation Act Section U/A226. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 30th March 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 19-Mar-2021

CNR: HCBM040266262018

Filing Number

WP/19861/2018

Filing Date

29-Aug-2018

Registration No

WP/7797/2018

Registration Date

15-Nov-2018

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil L. Pansare , Hon'ble Justice Nivedita Prakash Mehta

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil L. Pansare , Hon'ble Justice Nivedita Prakash Mehta

Bench Type

Division

Category

LAND ACQUISITION/REQUISITION(CENTRAL/STATE) ( 20 )

Sub-Category

OTHERS ( 99 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

30-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 08-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Project Affected Persons Rehabilitation Act Section U/A226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAMLAL S/O DAULAT ALKARI (RAJPUT)

    Adv. S. W. DESHPANDE,ASHOK P. KHADATKAR,ASHOK P. KHADATKAR, ,ASHOK P. KHADATKAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THROUGH ITS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF IRRIGATION, MUMBAI AND ANOTHER Advocate - PURUSHOTTAM PATIL, (FOR R

  2. 2.TAPI PATBANDHARE VIKAS MAHAMANDAL, THR. PRE. PARYAWARAN VISHAYAK LOKASUNAWANI SAMITI and DY. COLLEC

    Adv. (FOR R

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 30-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil L. Pansare,hon'ble Justice Nivedita Prakash MehtaView PDF

    The Bombay High Court dismissed 83 consolidated writ petitions filed by land owners seeking enhanced compensation for lands acquired under the Kurha Wadhoda irrigation project. The court held that the cited Supreme Court precedent (Daulat Sitaram Kodone) was inapplicable as the facts were substantially different, and found that subsequent higher compensation rates resulted from legitimate government policy adjustments, not arbitrary discrimination. The court also imposed costs of Rs. 5,000 per petition due to the petitioners' counsel suppressing prior adverse judgments on identical facts and attempting to mislead the court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 30-Mar-2026

    Fresh Admission-Prioritised Cases/Old Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil L. Pansare , Hon'ble Justice Nivedita Prakash Mehta

  4. 24-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil L. Pansare,hon'ble Justice Nivedita Prakash MehtaView PDF

  5. 19-Mar-2021

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 29-Aug-2018

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/7797/2018

casestatus.in Summary

The Bombay High Court dismissed 83 consolidated writ petitions filed by land owners seeking enhanced compensation for lands acquired under the Kurha Wadhoda irrigation project. The court held that the cited Supreme Court precedent (Daulat Sitaram Kodone) was inapplicable as the facts were substantially different, and found that subsequent higher compensation rates resulted from legitimate government policy adjustments, not arbitrary discrimination. The court also imposed costs of Rs. 5,000 per petition due to the petitioners' counsel suppressing prior adverse judgments on identical facts and attempting to mislead the court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case