DURGA VITHHOBA CHAUDHARI @ SAU. DURGA HARIDAS BORKAR vs S. T. CERTIFICATE SCRUTINY COMMITTEE, NAGPUR, THR. DY. DIRECTOR AND MEMBER SECY., AND ORS. — WP/4962/2025
Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Next hearing: 08th May 2026.
CNR: HCBM040252912025
Next Hearing
08th May 2026
Filing Number
WP/18407/2025
Filing Date
08-08-2025
Registration No
WP/4962/2025
Registration Date
26-08-2025
Judge
REGISTRAR (JUDICIAL)
Coram
REGISTRAR (JUDICIAL)
Bench Type
Division
Judicial Branch
Civil
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
DURGA VITHHOBA CHAUDHARI @ SAU. DURGA HARIDAS BORKAR
Adv. KRISHNA S. AGRAWAL,CHINTAN SANDIP TAMHANE,CHINTAN SANDIP TAMHANE, ,CHINTAN SANDIP TAMHANE
Respondent(s)
S. T. CERTIFICATE SCRUTINY COMMITTEE, NAGPUR, THR. DY. DIRECTOR AND MEMBER SECY., AND ORS.
THE COLLECTOR, NAGPUR
TAHSILDAR, UMRED, NAGPUR
GRAM PANCHAYAT, AMBOLI, NAGPUR, (THR. SECRETARY)
Hearing History
Judge: REGISTRAR (JUDICIAL)
FOR ORDERS -
FOR ORDERS -
FOR ORDERS -
FOR ORDERS -
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 15-09-2025 | |
| 08-05-2026 | FOR ORDERS - |
| 24-04-2026 | FOR ORDERS - |
| 01-04-2026 | FOR ORDERS - |
| 24-03-2026 | FOR ORDERS - |
Orders
Case Summary: WP 4962/2025 Outcome: The petition was dismissed against Respondent No. 4 in default on 08/05/2026 for the petitioner's failure to supply a copy for issuance of notice. Despite being granted sufficient time on multiple dates, the petitioner's counsel took no steps, leading to automatic dismissal under Chapter XVII Rule 7(iii) of the Bombay High Court Appellate Side Rules, 1960, unless remedied within four weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: WP 4962/2025 Outcome: The petition was dismissed against Respondent No. 4 in default on 08/05/2026 for the petitioner's failure to supply a copy for issuance of notice. Despite being granted sufficient time on multiple dates, the petitioner's counsel took no steps, leading to automatic dismissal under Chapter XVII Rule 7(iii) of the Bombay High Court Appellate Side Rules, 1960, unless remedied within four weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts