HIRAMAN S/O SHAMRAO GHARAT vs THE VICE CHAIRMAN /MEMBER SECRETARY, SCHEDULED TRIBE CASTE CERT. SCRUTINY COMM. NAGPUR AND ANOTHER — WP/6637/2022
Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: --ALLOWED on 05th May 2026.
CNR: HCBM040247352022
Filing Number
WP/16481/2022
Filing Date
07-Oct-2022
Registration No
WP/6637/2022
Registration Date
19-Oct-2022
Judge
Hon'ble Smt. Justice M. S. Jawalkar , Hon'ble Shri Justice Nandesh Shankarrao Deshpande
Coram
Hon'ble Smt. Justice M. S. Jawalkar , Hon'ble Shri Justice Nandesh Shankarrao Deshpande
Bench Type
Division
Category
APPOINTMENT OF CONSTITUTIONAL FUNCTIONARIES ( 3 )
Sub-Category
OTHERS ( 99 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
05-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
--ALLOWED
Last updated 18-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.HIRAMAN S/O SHAMRAO GHARAT
Adv. PREETI D RANE,HIMANI KAVI,HIMANI KAVI, ,HIMANI KAVI
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE VICE CHAIRMAN /MEMBER SECRETARY, SCHEDULED TRIBE CASTE CERT. SCRUTINY COMM. NAGPUR AND ANOTHER
Adv. ,CHARPE RAMKRISHNA SADASHIVRAO,SANKET RAMKRISHNA CHARPE 1123
-
2.THE DIVISIONAL CONTROLLER, MAHARASHTRA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, NAGPUR DIVISION, NAGPUR
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
05-May-2026
Hon'ble Smt. Justice M. S. Jawalkar,hon'ble Shri Justice Nandesh Shankarrao DeshpandeView PDF
Case Summary: WP 6637/2022 - Hiraman S/o Shamrao Gharat The Bombay High Court's Nagpur Bench allowed multiple consolidated writ petitions and declared that the petitioners belong to the 'Mana' Scheduled Tribe, invalidating the Scrutiny Committee's rejection orders. The court found the Committee's reasoning—that oldest documents (1911-1916) couldn't confirm "Mana Scheduled Tribe" status, that certain records were unavailable or in poor condition, and that contradictory "Mana Kunbi" entries existed—to be legally unsustainable, as pre-constitutional documents carry greater probative value and no "Kunbi" subcaste exists within Mana cluster notifications. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
20-Apr-2026
For Admission - Circulated Matters (Civil Side Matters)
Hon'ble Smt. Justice M. S. Jawalkar , Hon'ble Shri Justice Nandesh Shankarrao Deshpande
-
10-Nov-2025
For Admission-Caste Scrutiny Matters
Hon'ble Smt. Justice M. S. Jawalkar , Hon'ble Shri Justice Raj D. Wakode
-
07-Oct-2025
For Admission-Caste Scrutiny Matters
Hon'ble Smt. Justice M. S. Jawalkar , Hon'ble Shri Justice Raj D. Wakode
-
20-Sep-2025
Hon'ble Smt. Justice M. S. Jawalkar,hon'ble Shri Justice Raj D. WakodeView PDF
-
06-Mar-2024
For Admission - (Civil Side Matters)
Hon'ble Shri Justice Nitin W. Sambre , Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay J. Mantri
-
14-Feb-2024
Hon'ble Shri Justice Nitin W. Sambre,hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay J. MantriView PDF
-
14-Feb-2024
For Admission - (Civil Side Matters)
Hon'ble Shri Justice Nitin W. Sambre , Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay J. Mantri
-
17-Jan-2024
Hon'ble Shri Justice Nitin W. Sambre,hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay J. MantriView PDF
-
17-Jan-2024
For Admission - (Civil Side Matters)
Hon'ble Shri Justice Nitin W. Sambre , Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay J. Mantri
-
03-Jan-2024
Hon'ble Shri Justice Nitin W. Sambre,hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay J. MantriView PDF
-
13-Dec-2022
For Admission - (Civil Side Matters)
Hon'ble Shri Justice A.S. Chandurkar , Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil L. Pansare
-
22-Nov-2022
Hon'ble Shri Justice A.S. Chandurkar,hon'ble Shri Justice Anil L. PansareView PDF
-
22-Nov-2022
Fresh Admission - (Civil Side Matters)
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sunil B. Shukre , Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil L. Pansare
-
20-Oct-2022
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sunil B. Shukre,hon'ble Shri Justice Anil L. PansareView PDF
-
20-Oct-2022
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
07-Oct-2022
Case filed
Registration No. WP/6637/2022
Case Summary: WP 6637/2022 - Hiraman S/o Shamrao Gharat The Bombay High Court's Nagpur Bench allowed multiple consolidated writ petitions and declared that the petitioners belong to the 'Mana' Scheduled Tribe, invalidating the Scrutiny Committee's rejection orders. The court found the Committee's reasoning—that oldest documents (1911-1916) couldn't confirm "Mana Scheduled Tribe" status, that certain records were unavailable or in poor condition, and that contradictory "Mana Kunbi" entries existed—to be legally unsustainable, as pre-constitutional documents carry greater probative value and no "Kunbi" subcaste exists within Mana cluster notifications. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts