KALANDARKHA S/O AJIJKHA vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THROUGH ITS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF IRRIGATION, MUMBAI AND ANOTHER Advocate - PURUSHOTTAM PATIL, (FOR R — WP/7773/2018

Case under Project Affected Persons Rehabilitation Act Section U/A226. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 30th March 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 24-Mar-2021

CNR: HCBM040237782018

Filing Number

WP/17635/2018

Filing Date

02-Aug-2018

Registration No

WP/7773/2018

Registration Date

15-Nov-2018

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil L. Pansare , Hon'ble Justice Nivedita Prakash Mehta

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil L. Pansare , Hon'ble Justice Nivedita Prakash Mehta

Bench Type

Division

Category

LAND ACQUISITION/REQUISITION(CENTRAL/STATE) ( 20 )

Sub-Category

OTHERS ( 99 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

30-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 08-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Project Affected Persons Rehabilitation Act Section U/A226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.KALANDARKHA S/O AJIJKHA

    Adv. S. W. DESHPANDE,ASHOK P. KHADATKAR,ASHOK P. KHADATKAR, ,ASHOK P. KHADATKAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THROUGH ITS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF IRRIGATION, MUMBAI AND ANOTHER Advocate - PURUSHOTTAM PATIL, (FOR R

  2. 2.TAPI IRRIGATION DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, THROUGH ITS EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 30-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil L. Pansare,hon'ble Justice Nivedita Prakash MehtaView PDF

    Court Summary The Bombay High Court (Nagpur Bench) dismissed 84 consolidated writ petitions filed by landowners seeking enhanced compensation for land acquired under the "Kurha Wadhoda Islampur Upsa Sinchan Yojana" project. The court held that the petitioners' reliance on the Supreme Court judgment in *Daulat Sitaram Kodone* was inapplicable as the factual circumstances were substantially different, and that a coordinate bench had already rejected identical arguments. The court also imposed costs of Rs. 5,000 per petition and criticized the petitioners' counsel for suppressing prior adverse orders and attempting to mislead the court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 30-Mar-2026

    Fresh Admission-Prioritised Cases/Old Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil L. Pansare , Hon'ble Justice Nivedita Prakash Mehta

  4. 24-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil L. Pansare,hon'ble Justice Nivedita Prakash MehtaView PDF

  5. 24-Mar-2021

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 02-Aug-2018

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/7773/2018

casestatus.in Summary

Court Summary The Bombay High Court (Nagpur Bench) dismissed 84 consolidated writ petitions filed by landowners seeking enhanced compensation for land acquired under the "Kurha Wadhoda Islampur Upsa Sinchan Yojana" project. The court held that the petitioners' reliance on the Supreme Court judgment in *Daulat Sitaram Kodone* was inapplicable as the factual circumstances were substantially different, and that a coordinate bench had already rejected identical arguments. The court also imposed costs of Rs. 5,000 per petition and criticized the petitioners' counsel for suppressing prior adverse orders and attempting to mislead the court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case