SAYYAD AYANODDIN SAYYAD ABDULLA DEAD, THROUGH LRS. GULSHANBI W/O HANIFODDIN PATEL AND OTHERS vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THROUGH ITS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF IRRIGATION, MUMBAI AND ANOTHER Advocate - PURUSHOTTAM PATIL, (FOR R — WP/7809/2018

Case under Project Affected Persons Rehabilitation Act Section U/A226. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 30th March 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 18-Mar-2021

CNR: HCBM040237482018

Filing Number

WP/17608/2018

Filing Date

02-Aug-2018

Registration No

WP/7809/2018

Registration Date

15-Nov-2018

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil L. Pansare , Hon'ble Justice Nivedita Prakash Mehta

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil L. Pansare , Hon'ble Justice Nivedita Prakash Mehta

Bench Type

Division

Category

LAND ACQUISITION/REQUISITION(CENTRAL/STATE) ( 20 )

Sub-Category

OTHERS ( 99 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

30-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 08-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Project Affected Persons Rehabilitation Act Section U/A226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SAYYAD AYANODDIN SAYYAD ABDULLA DEAD, THROUGH LRS. GULSHANBI W/O HANIFODDIN PATEL AND OTHERS

    Adv. S. W. DESHPANDE,ASHOK P. KHADATKAR,ASHOK P. KHADATKAR, ,ASHOK P. KHADATKAR

  2. 2.NABISHANBI W/O SHAIKH AJIJ

    Adv. ASHOK P. KHADATKAR

  3. 3.ROOMSHANBI W/O SHAIKH ADIL

    Adv. ASHOK P. KHADATKAR

  4. 4.SAYYAD IMAMODDIN S/O SAYYAD

    Adv. ASHOK P. KHADATKAR

  5. 5.SAYYAD MEHMOD S/O SAYYAD AYANODDIN

    Adv. ASHOK P. KHADATKAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THROUGH ITS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF IRRIGATION, MUMBAI AND ANOTHER Advocate - PURUSHOTTAM PATIL, (FOR R

  2. 2.TAPI PATBANDHARE VIKAS MAHAMANDAL, THR. PRE. PARYAWARAN VISHAYAK LOKASUNAWANI SAMITI and DY. COLLEC

    Adv. (FOR R

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 30-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil L. Pansare,hon'ble Justice Nivedita Prakash MehtaView PDF

    Summary The Bombay High Court (Nagpur Bench) dismissed 83 consolidated writ petitions seeking enhanced compensation for land acquired under the Kurha Wadhoda irrigation project. The petitioners argued they deserved parity with later landowners who received higher rates, but the court held that a prior coordinate bench had already rejected identical claims, finding the cited Supreme Court precedent (*Daulat Sitaram Kodone*) inapplicable to their facts. The court imposed costs of Rs. 5,000 per petition, also censuring the petitioners' counsel for suppressing the prior unfavorable judgment and misleading the court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 30-Mar-2026

    Fresh Admission-Prioritised Cases/Old Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil L. Pansare , Hon'ble Justice Nivedita Prakash Mehta

  4. 24-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil L. Pansare,hon'ble Justice Nivedita Prakash MehtaView PDF

  5. 18-Mar-2021

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 02-Aug-2018

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/7809/2018

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Bombay High Court (Nagpur Bench) dismissed 83 consolidated writ petitions seeking enhanced compensation for land acquired under the Kurha Wadhoda irrigation project. The petitioners argued they deserved parity with later landowners who received higher rates, but the court held that a prior coordinate bench had already rejected identical claims, finding the cited Supreme Court precedent (*Daulat Sitaram Kodone*) inapplicable to their facts. The court imposed costs of Rs. 5,000 per petition, also censuring the petitioners' counsel for suppressing the prior unfavorable judgment and misleading the court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case