KAMRUDDIN S/O ABDUL MAJID vs MOHD. SAYEED S/O NOOR MOHAMMAD (DEAD) THROUGH LRS., SMT. LATIFABEE W/O MOHD. AFZAL AND OTHERS — CAS/530/2022

Case under Other Act Section 05. Next hearing: 28th November 2022.

Next hearing 28-Nov-2022

CNR: HCBM040235652021

Filing Number

CAS/15641/2021

Filing Date

30-Nov-2021

Registration No

CAS/530/2022

Registration Date

24-May-2022

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil

Last updated 11-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Other Act Section 05

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.KAMRUDDIN S/O ABDUL MAJID

    Adv. MANISH RAJENDRA JOHARAPURKAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MOHD. SAYEED S/O NOOR MOHAMMAD (DEAD) THROUGH LRS., SMT. LATIFABEE W/O MOHD. AFZAL AND OTHERS

Case History

  1. 28-Nov-2022

    Next hearingPending

  2. 09-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Rohit Wasudeo JoshiView PDF

    Case Summary: CAS 530/2022 The High Court of Bombay (Nagpur Bench) allowed the petitioner's applications to add legal representatives of deceased respondents to Second Appeal No. 200 of 2015. The court condoned the delay in filing and set aside abatement, permitting legal representatives of respondents 6, 12(B), 42, 45, and 48 to be added as parties. Notice will be issued to newly added respondents on 31.07.2026 after amendments are completed by 25.06.2026, with service via speed post required. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 28-Nov-2022

    For Admission -

    Hon'ble Smt. Justice M. S. Jawalkar

  4. 30-Nov-2021

    Case filed

    Registration No. CAS/530/2022

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CAS 530/2022 The High Court of Bombay (Nagpur Bench) allowed the petitioner's applications to add legal representatives of deceased respondents to Second Appeal No. 200 of 2015. The court condoned the delay in filing and set aside abatement, permitting legal representatives of respondents 6, 12(B), 42, 45, and 48 to be added as parties. Notice will be issued to newly added respondents on 31.07.2026 after amendments are completed by 25.06.2026, with service via speed post required. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case