BHEMSING S/O GYANSING PAWARA vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THR. ITS SECRETARY, DEPT. OF IRRIGATION, MUMBAI AND ANOTHER Advocate - PURUSHOTTAM PATIL, (FOR R — WP/7767/2018

Case under Project Affected Persons Rehabilitation Act Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 30th March 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 25-Mar-2021

CNR: HCBM040230172018

Filing Number

WP/17034/2018

Filing Date

28-Jul-2018

Registration No

WP/7767/2018

Registration Date

15-Nov-2018

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil L. Pansare , Hon'ble Justice Nivedita Prakash Mehta

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil L. Pansare , Hon'ble Justice Nivedita Prakash Mehta

Bench Type

Division

Category

LAND ACQUISITION/REQUISITION(CENTRAL/STATE) ( 20 )

Sub-Category

OTHERS ( 99 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

30-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 08-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Project Affected Persons Rehabilitation Act Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.BHEMSING S/O GYANSING PAWARA

    Adv. S. W. DESHPANDE,ASHOK P. KHADATKAR,ASHOK P. KHADATKAR, ,ASHOK P. KHADATKAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THR. ITS SECRETARY, DEPT. OF IRRIGATION, MUMBAI AND ANOTHER Advocate - PURUSHOTTAM PATIL, (FOR R

  2. 2.TAPI IRRIGATION DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, THROUGH ITS EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 30-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil L. Pansare,hon'ble Justice Nivedita Prakash MehtaView PDF

    Case Summary The Bombay High Court (Nagpur Bench) dismissed 83 consolidated writ petitions filed by land owners seeking enhanced compensation for lands acquired under the "Kurha Wadhoda Islampur Upsa Sinchan Yojana" project. The court held that the Daulat Sitaram Kodone Supreme Court judgment relied upon by petitioners was factually distinguishable and inapplicable. The court also censured the petitioners' counsel for suppressing a prior coordinate bench decision rejecting identical claims and attempting to mislead the court, imposing costs of Rs. 5,000 per petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 30-Mar-2026

    Fresh Admission-Prioritised Cases/Old Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil L. Pansare , Hon'ble Justice Nivedita Prakash Mehta

  4. 24-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil L. Pansare,hon'ble Justice Nivedita Prakash MehtaView PDF

  5. 25-Mar-2021

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 28-Jul-2018

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/7767/2018

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary The Bombay High Court (Nagpur Bench) dismissed 83 consolidated writ petitions filed by land owners seeking enhanced compensation for lands acquired under the "Kurha Wadhoda Islampur Upsa Sinchan Yojana" project. The court held that the Daulat Sitaram Kodone Supreme Court judgment relied upon by petitioners was factually distinguishable and inapplicable. The court also censured the petitioners' counsel for suppressing a prior coordinate bench decision rejecting identical claims and attempting to mislead the court, imposing costs of Rs. 5,000 per petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case