RITESH SURAJMAL JAISWAL vs ANJUMAN MOFIDUL ISMAL EDUCATION SOCIETY, THR ITS CHAIRMAN DR. WAQAR UI HAQUE KHAN AND OTHERS — HCBM40219452025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 41 RULE 22.
CNR: HCBM040219452025
Filing Number
XOB/15889/2025
Filing Date
15-Jul-2025
Judge
Registrar (Judicial)
Coram
Registrar (Judicial)
Bench Type
Single
Judicial Branch
Civil
Last updated 18-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.RITESH SURAJMAL JAISWAL
Adv. RAHUL JAYWANTRAO SHINDE,K. S. MALOKAR,K. S. MALOKAR, (CROSS OBJECTOR),(CROSS OBJECTOR),K. S. MALOKAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.ANJUMAN MOFIDUL ISMAL EDUCATION SOCIETY, THR ITS CHAIRMAN DR. WAQAR UI HAQUE KHAN AND OTHERS
-
2.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THR. SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, BULDHANA
-
3.PRAVIN SURAJMAL JAISWAL
-
4.DURGABAI WD/O. SURAJMAL JAISWAL
-
5.SAU. RAJESHRI SHARAD JAISWAL
-
6.SAU. MAMTA PRAKASH JAISWAL
Case History
-
08-Jun-2026
For Orders -
Registrar (Judicial)
-
05-May-2026
Registrar (Judicial)View PDF
CASE SUMMARY In First Appeal 135 of 2010, the Bombay High Court (Nagpur Bench) ordered that the appellant's counsel must remove the present objection within 14 days by filing an application for condonation of delay. If this is not done, the registration of the appeal shall be refused. (Dated: 5th May, 2026) This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
06-Jan-2026
For Orders -
Registrar (Judicial)
-
23-Dec-2025
Registrar (Judicial)View PDF
-
09-Dec-2025
For Orders -
Registrar (Judicial)
-
25-Nov-2025
Registrar (Judicial)View PDF
-
04-Nov-2025
For Orders -
Registrar (Judicial)
-
04-Nov-2025
For Orders -
Registrar (Judicial)
-
14-Oct-2025
Registrar (Judicial)View PDF
-
14-Oct-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
15-Jul-2025
Case filed
CASE SUMMARY In First Appeal 135 of 2010, the Bombay High Court (Nagpur Bench) ordered that the appellant's counsel must remove the present objection within 14 days by filing an application for condonation of delay. If this is not done, the registration of the appeal shall be refused. (Dated: 5th May, 2026) This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts