MAHESH CHOKHELAL GUPTA AND OTHERS vs HUKUMCHAND CHOKHELAL GUPTA AND OTHERS — SA/209/2026
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 100. Next hearing: 17th June 2026.
CNR: HCBM040215562024
e-Filing Number
02-08-2024
Filing Number
SA/15053/2024
Filing Date
05-Aug-2024
Registration No
SA/209/2026
Registration Date
01-Jun-2026
Bench Type
Single
Category
SUITS ( 38 )
Sub-Category
OTHER ( 99 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Last updated 18-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.MAHESH CHOKHELAL GUPTA AND OTHERS
Adv. DHIRAJ S. JOSHI
-
2.SHEKAR CHOKHELAL GUPTA
Respondent(s)
-
1.HUKUMCHAND CHOKHELAL GUPTA AND OTHERS
-
2.MOHANLAL CHOKHELAL GUPTA
-
3.LEELABAI BHARATLAL GUPTA
-
4.SAU. SHELABAI DINESH GUPTA
Case History
-
17-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
17-Jun-2026
—
Lok - Adalat
-
09-May-2026
Lok - AdalatView PDF
Case Summary: SA/209/2026 In this property partition dispute, the National Lok Adalat disposed of the Second Appeal as settled following a compromise between the parties. The appellants and respondents agreed to sell the suit property and distribute the sale proceeds equally, replacing the trial court's earlier partition decree that had granted 1/6th share to the plaintiff and defendants 2-6. Court fee was ordered refunded as per rules. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
27-Nov-2025
For Orders
Registrar (Judicial)
-
13-Nov-2025
Registrar (Judicial)View PDF
-
09-Oct-2025
For Orders
Registrar (Judicial)
-
18-Sep-2025
Registrar (Judicial)View PDF
-
21-Aug-2025
For Orders-
Registrar (Judicial)
-
07-Aug-2025
Registrar (Judicial)View PDF
-
10-Jul-2025
For Orders --
Registrar (Judicial)
-
26-Jun-2025
Registrar (Judicial)View PDF
-
26-Jun-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
05-Aug-2024
Case filed
Registration No. SA/209/2026
Case Summary: SA/209/2026 In this property partition dispute, the National Lok Adalat disposed of the Second Appeal as settled following a compromise between the parties. The appellants and respondents agreed to sell the suit property and distribute the sale proceeds equally, replacing the trial court's earlier partition decree that had granted 1/6th share to the plaintiff and defendants 2-6. Court fee was ordered refunded as per rules. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts