REKHA DEEPAK TAYADE AND OTHER vs ABDUL SALAM ABDUL AZIZ — CAS/309/2026

Case under Limitation Act Section 5. Next hearing: 18th June 2026.

Next hearing 18-Jun-2026

CNR: HCBM040211022025

e-Filing Number

06-07-2025

Filing Number

CAS/15367/2025

Filing Date

07-Jul-2025

Registration No

CAS/309/2026

Registration Date

06-Mar-2026

Judge

Registrar (Judicial)

Coram

Registrar (Judicial)

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil

Last updated 18-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Limitation Act Section 5

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.REKHA DEEPAK TAYADE AND OTHER

    Adv. MANDAR R. DESHPANDE

  2. 2.Deepak Jayaram Tayade

    Adv. MANDAR RAVINDRA DESHPANDE

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.ABDUL SALAM ABDUL AZIZ

Case History

  1. 18-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 07-May-2026

    Registrar (Judicial)View PDF

    Case Summary - CAS/309/2026 The High Court of Bombay (Nagpur Bench) adjourned the second appeal filed by Rekha Deepak Tayade and others against Abdul Salam Abdul Aziz. The court directed the Standing Officer to supply case copies within two weeks; if supplied timely, the returnable date is extended by five weeks. No substantive orders on merits were passed at this preliminary hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Apr-2026

    Registrar (Judicial)View PDF

  4. 10-Apr-2026

    For Orders -

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Rohit Wasudeo Joshi

  5. 26-Mar-2026

    Registrar (Judicial)View PDF

  6. 24-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 07-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Rohit Wasudeo JoshiView PDF

  8. 07-Jul-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. CAS/309/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary - CAS/309/2026 The High Court of Bombay (Nagpur Bench) adjourned the second appeal filed by Rekha Deepak Tayade and others against Abdul Salam Abdul Aziz. The court directed the Standing Officer to supply case copies within two weeks; if supplied timely, the returnable date is extended by five weeks. No substantive orders on merits were passed at this preliminary hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case