SACHIN SHIVDAS MATODE vs THE JOINT DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION, AMRAVATI DIVISION, AMRAVATI AND OTHERS — CAW/1649/2021

Case under Other Act Section 1. Disposed: --C.A. Disposed off on 09th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM040205632021

Filing Number

CAW/13511/2021

Filing Date

25-Oct-2021

Registration No

CAW/1649/2021

Registration Date

25-Oct-2021

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Yanshivraj Gopichand Khobragade , Hon'ble Shri Justice Sushil M. Ghodeswar

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Yanshivraj Gopichand Khobragade , Hon'ble Shri Justice Sushil M. Ghodeswar

Bench Type

Division

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

09-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

--C.A. Disposed off

Last updated 11-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Other Act Section 1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SACHIN SHIVDAS MATODE

    Adv. S. M. VAISHNAV

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE JOINT DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION, AMRAVATI DIVISION, AMRAVATI AND OTHERS

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Yanshivraj Gopichand Khobragade,hon'ble Shri Justice Sushil M. GhodeswarView PDF

    The Bombay High Court (Nagpur Bench) allowed Sachin Shivdas Matode's Civil Application to raise additional grounds in his writ petition against the Joint Director of Education, Amravati. The court permitted the amendment since the proposed grounds did not alter the petition's nature. The petitioner was directed to file necessary amendments within two weeks, supply copies to respondents, and any earlier interim order continues until the next hearing date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 25-Oct-2021

    Case filed

    Registration No. CAW/1649/2021

casestatus.in Summary

The Bombay High Court (Nagpur Bench) allowed Sachin Shivdas Matode's Civil Application to raise additional grounds in his writ petition against the Joint Director of Education, Amravati. The court permitted the amendment since the proposed grounds did not alter the petition's nature. The petitioner was directed to file necessary amendments within two weeks, supply copies to respondents, and any earlier interim order continues until the next hearing date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case