V.I.D.C. THR. ITS EXE. ENGINEER JB KASAT vs SAMADHAN GOVINDA WAYAL AND 2 ORS — FA/852/2012
Case under Land Acquisition Act. Next hearing: 17th June 2026.
CNR: HCBM040197842011
Filing Number
FA/15706/2011
Filing Date
03-Sep-2011
Registration No
FA/852/2012
Registration Date
10-Sep-2012
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sushil M. Ghodeswar
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sushil M. Ghodeswar
Bench Type
Single
Judicial Branch
Civil
Last updated 18-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.V.I.D.C. THR. ITS EXE. ENGINEER JB KASAT
Respondent(s)
-
1.SAMADHAN GOVINDA WAYAL AND 2 ORS
Adv. AGP/R-2 & 3 (MEMO AWAITED) 1123
-
2.THE STATE OF MAH. THR. COLLECTOR, BULDHANA
Adv. AGP/R-2 & 3 (MEMO AWAITED)
-
3.THE SPECIAL LAO, BULDHANA
Adv. AGP/R-2 & 3 (MEMO AWAITED)
Case History
-
17-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
17-Jun-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sushil M. GhodeswarView PDF
Case Summary: FA/852/2012 VIDC appealed a 2010 land acquisition judgment from Buldhana's lower court. The High Court accepted VIDC's submission that the appeals fell under a 2016 Government Resolution (with 2018 corrigendum) directing that appeals should not be preferred if the enhanced rate is less than four times the Land Acquisition Officer's awarded rate. The appeals were disposed of accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
17-Feb-2015
Hon'ble Shri Justice Z.A. HaqView PDF
-
17-Feb-2015
Ready Matter
Hon'ble Shri Justice Z.A. Haq
-
17-Feb-2015
Private Paper Book Not Filed
Hon'ble Shri Justice Z.A. Haq
-
15-Jul-2013
Hon'ble Shri Justice A.P. BhangaleView PDF
-
15-Jul-2013
For Orders- (Civil Side Matters)
Hon'ble Shri Justice A.P. Bhangale
-
27-Nov-2012
For Orders (At 4.30 P.m)
Registrar (Judicial)
-
03-Sep-2012
Hon'ble Shri Justice M.N. GilaniView PDF
-
03-Sep-2012
For Orders- (Civil Side Matters)
Hon'ble Shri Justice M.N. Gilani
-
11-May-2012
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
03-Sep-2011
Case filed
Registration No. FA/852/2012
Case Summary: FA/852/2012 VIDC appealed a 2010 land acquisition judgment from Buldhana's lower court. The High Court accepted VIDC's submission that the appeals fell under a 2016 Government Resolution (with 2018 corrigendum) directing that appeals should not be preferred if the enhanced rate is less than four times the Land Acquisition Officer's awarded rate. The appeals were disposed of accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts