SOU. MANISHA WD/O MANISH GORE AND ANR. KARIYA MANOJKUMAR PRABHUDAS, ,UTTAM A. SANGRAME,KARTIK NAMDEO PADOLE,PARITA N. LAKHANI vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR PSO RAILWAY PS BADNERA DIST AMRAVATI AND ANR. — APL/867/2025

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 528. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 12th November 2025.

Case disposed Next hearing 08-Jul-2025

CNR: HCBM040196152025

e-Filing Number

22-06-2025

Filing Number

APL/5263/2025

Filing Date

25-Jun-2025

Registration No

APL/867/2025

Registration Date

27-Jun-2025

Judge

Hon'ble Justice Urmila Joshi Phalke , Hon'ble Shri Justice Nandesh Shankarrao Deshpande

Coram

Hon'ble Justice Urmila Joshi Phalke , Hon'ble Shri Justice Nandesh Shankarrao Deshpande

Bench Type

Division

Category

CRIMINAL ( 9 )

Sub-Category

QUASHING OF FIR C.R., CHARGE SHEET OR PROSECUTION ( 26 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal

Decision Date

12-Nov-2025

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 18-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 528

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SOU. MANISHA WD/O MANISH GORE AND ANR. KARIYA MANOJKUMAR PRABHUDAS, ,UTTAM A. SANGRAME,KARTIK NAMDEO PADOLE,PARITA N. LAKHANI

  2. 2.PRASAD S/O MANISH GORE

    Adv. KARIYA MANOJKUMAR PRABHUDAS

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR PSO RAILWAY PS (Police Station) BADNERA DIST AMRAVATI AND ANR.

  2. 2.SHASHIKANT RAJESHWAR BHAT

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-Nov-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Urmila Joshi Phalke,hon'ble Shri Justice Nandesh Shankarrao DeshpandeView PDF

    Case Summary: APL 867/2025 The Nagpur Bench of Bombay High Court quashed FIR No. 0033/2025 against the applicants for alleged abetment of suicide under Sections 108 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. The court found no incriminating material showing direct or indirect acts of instigation by the applicants, nor any evidence of their intention to instigate the deceased's suicide. Applying Supreme Court precedent requiring proof of proximate prior acts and clear mens rea, the bench held that a mere property/inheritance dispute lacking deliberate suicidal incitement cannot constitute abetment of suicide. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-May-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Urmila Joshi Phalke,hon'ble Shri Justice Nandesh Shankarrao DeshpandeView PDF

  4. 12-Nov-2025

    Hon'ble Justice Urmila Joshi Phalke,hon'ble Shri Justice Nandesh Shankarrao DeshpandeView PDF

  5. 07-Oct-2025

    Hon'ble Justice Urmila Joshi Phalke,hon'ble Shri Justice Nandesh Shankarrao DeshpandeView PDF

  6. 25-Aug-2025

    Office Objection Not Removed (Criminal Side Matters)

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil L. Pansare , Hon'ble Shri Justice M. M. Nerlikar

  7. 11-Aug-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil L. Pansare,hon'ble Shri Justice M. M. NerlikarView PDF

  8. 11-Aug-2025

    —

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil L. Pansare , Hon'ble Shri Justice M. M. Nerlikar

  9. 21-Jul-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil L. Pansare,hon'ble Shri Justice M. M. NerlikarView PDF

  10. 21-Jul-2025

    Application For Admission - Fresh - (Criminal Side Matters)

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil S. Kilor , Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Vrushali V. Joshi

  11. 08-Jul-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  12. 30-Jun-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil S. Kilor,hon'ble Mrs. Justice Vrushali V. JoshiView PDF

  13. 25-Jun-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. APL/867/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: APL 867/2025 The Nagpur Bench of Bombay High Court quashed FIR No. 0033/2025 against the applicants for alleged abetment of suicide under Sections 108 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. The court found no incriminating material showing direct or indirect acts of instigation by the applicants, nor any evidence of their intention to instigate the deceased's suicide. Applying Supreme Court precedent requiring proof of proximate prior acts and clear mens rea, the bench held that a mere property/inheritance dispute lacking deliberate suicidal incitement cannot constitute abetment of suicide. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case