JAYESH PRAVIN CHOUDHARI AND ANR. vs UNION BANK OF INDIA, THR. ITS AUTHORISED OFFICER AND ORS. — WP/4779/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226,227. Next hearing: 19th June 2026.

Next hearing 19-Jun-2026

CNR: HCBM040191402026

Filing Number

WP/13006/2026

Filing Date

19-Jun-2026

Registration No

WP/4779/2026

Registration Date

19-Jun-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil S. Kilor , Hon'ble Shri Justice Raj D. Wakode

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil S. Kilor , Hon'ble Shri Justice Raj D. Wakode

Bench Type

Division

Judicial Branch

Civil

Last updated 20-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226,227
Securitisation & Reconstruction of Finiancial Assets Act

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.JAYESH PRAVIN CHOUDHARI AND ANR.

    Adv. RAHUL DILIP DHANDE,SAKSHI TIWARI,SAKSHI TIWARI, ,SAKSHI TIWARI

  2. 2.PRAVIN NAVALCHAND CHAUDHARY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.UNION BANK OF INDIA, THR. ITS AUTHORISED OFFICER AND ORS.

  2. 2.DESH VIDESH SALES THR. PARTNERS DIPTI AVINASH GANDHE

  3. 3.DESH VIDESH SALES THR. PARTNERS VIJAY SURESH CHANDWANI

  4. 4.DESH VIDESH SALES THR. PARTNERS VIJAY GOBINDRAM BHOJWANI

Case History

  1. 19-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 07-Jul-2026

    —

  3. 19-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil S. Kilor,hon'ble Shri Justice Raj D. WakodeView PDF

    Case Summary: WP/4779/2026 The Nagpur Bench of the Bombay High Court dismissed the writ petition filed by Jayesh Pravin Choudhari and another against Union Bank of India and others on 19 June 2026. The court held that since the relief sought was against a private party, a writ petition was not maintainable, rendering the petition non-maintainable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 19-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/4779/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WP/4779/2026 The Nagpur Bench of the Bombay High Court dismissed the writ petition filed by Jayesh Pravin Choudhari and another against Union Bank of India and others on 19 June 2026. The court held that since the relief sought was against a private party, a writ petition was not maintainable, rendering the petition non-maintainable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case