CHOLAMANDALAM INVESTMENT AND FINANCE COMPANY LTD vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THROUGH MINISTRY OF LAW JUSTICE, MANTRALAYA, MUMBAI-400032 — WP/427/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 226and227. Next hearing: 19th June 2026.
CNR: HCBM040187332026
e-Filing Number
16-06-2026
Filing Number
WP/5967/2026
Filing Date
16-Jun-2026
Registration No
WP/427/2026
Registration Date
18-Jun-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Justice Urmila Joshi Phalke , Hon'ble Justice Nivedita Prakash Mehta
Coram
Hon'ble Justice Urmila Joshi Phalke , Hon'ble Justice Nivedita Prakash Mehta
Bench Type
Division
Category
CRIMINAL ( 9 )
Sub-Category
OTHERS ( 99 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal
Last updated 20-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.CHOLAMANDALAM INVESTMENT AND FINANCE COMPANY LTD
Adv. M. ANILKUMAR SHANKARLAL,YASH ABHAY KULLARWAR,YASH ABHAY KULLARWAR, ,DISHA CHANDAN KAMWANI,YASH ABHAY KULLARWAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THROUGH MINISTRY OF LAW JUSTICE, MANTRALAYA, MUMBAI-400032
-
2.THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE
-
3.THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE AMRAVATI
Case History
-
19-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
30-Jun-2026
—
-
19-Jun-2026
Hon'ble Justice Urmila Joshi Phalke,hon'ble Justice Nivedita Prakash MehtaView PDF
Case Summary: WP/427/2026 Cholamandalam Investment and Finance Company Ltd sought directions for expeditious disposal of Section 14 applications under the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets Act, 2002. The High Court (Nagpur Bench) disposed of the petition directing Respondent No.2 to decide the applications within two months in accordance with guidelines from CWP 938/2025, with all merits contentions kept open. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
16-Jun-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WP/427/2026
Case Summary: WP/427/2026 Cholamandalam Investment and Finance Company Ltd sought directions for expeditious disposal of Section 14 applications under the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets Act, 2002. The High Court (Nagpur Bench) disposed of the petition directing Respondent No.2 to decide the applications within two months in accordance with guidelines from CWP 938/2025, with all merits contentions kept open. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts