KAILAS S/O SHIVA RATHOD vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR POLICE STATION OFFICER — APL/1259/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 528. Next hearing: 06th July 2026.

Next hearing 06-Jul-2026

CNR: HCBM040182282026

e-Filing Number

10-06-2026

Filing Number

APL/5783/2026

Filing Date

12-Jun-2026

Registration No

APL/1259/2026

Registration Date

12-Jun-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice M. W. Chandwani

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice M. W. Chandwani

Bench Type

Single

Category

CRIMINAL ( 9 )

Sub-Category

QUASHING OF FIR C.R., CHARGE SHEET OR PROSECUTION ( 26 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal

Last updated 17-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 528
Mah. Prevention of Malpractices Act Section U/S 7 , 8

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.KAILAS S/O SHIVA RATHOD

    Adv. P R AGRAWAL, ,AASTHA RAKESH SHARMA,SHREYA HARISH BHAGAT,S. Y. DUNEDAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR POLICE STATION OFFICER

  2. 2.GAJANAN ANANDA PARANDE

Case History

  1. 06-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 06-Jul-2026

    Applications For Admission Fresh (Criminal Side Matters)

    Hon'ble Shri Justice M. W. Chandwani

  3. 23-Jun-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  4. 15-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice M. W. ChandwaniView PDF

    In Criminal Application APL 1259/2026, the Nagpur High Court issued notice to the respondents (State and Gajanan Ananda Parande) returnable on 06.07.2026. The court permitted service of the respondent no.2 by any private mode permissible in law, in addition to regular service. The case was adjourned for further hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  5. 12-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. APL/1259/2026

casestatus.in Summary

In Criminal Application APL 1259/2026, the Nagpur High Court issued notice to the respondents (State and Gajanan Ananda Parande) returnable on 06.07.2026. The court permitted service of the respondent no.2 by any private mode permissible in law, in addition to regular service. The case was adjourned for further hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case