DILIP BHAGCHAND JETHANI vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR PSO., PS MORSHI, AMRAVATI RURAL AMRAVATI — APL/1256/2026
Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 482. Next hearing: 06th July 2026.
CNR: HCBM040181812026
e-Filing Number
11-06-2026
Filing Number
APL/5763/2026
Filing Date
12-Jun-2026
Registration No
APL/1256/2026
Registration Date
12-Jun-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice M. W. Chandwani
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice M. W. Chandwani
Bench Type
Single
Category
CRIMINAL ( 9 )
Sub-Category
QUASHING OF FIR C.R., CHARGE SHEET OR PROSECUTION ( 26 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal
Last updated 17-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.DILIP BHAGCHAND JETHANI
Adv. KAMAL HARGUNDAN ANANDANI, ,BHAVIN K. SUCHAK
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR PSO., PS (Police Station) MORSHI, AMRAVATI RURAL AMRAVATI
-
2.FOOD SAFETY OFFICER SRINIWAS ASHRUJI KEDAR
Case History
-
06-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
06-Jul-2026
Applications For Admission Fresh (Criminal Side Matters)
Hon'ble Shri Justice M. W. Chandwani
-
23-Jun-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
15-Jun-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice M. W. ChandwaniView PDF
Case Summary: APL/1256/2026 The High Court at Bombay (Nagpur Bench) heard the criminal application filed by Dilip Bhagchand Jethani on June 15, 2026. The court issued notice to the respondents (State of Maharashtra through PS Balapur, Akola and another) returnable on July 6, 2026. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service of notice on behalf of the State, and the matter was adjourned for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
12-Jun-2026
Case filed
Registration No. APL/1256/2026
Case Summary: APL/1256/2026 The High Court at Bombay (Nagpur Bench) heard the criminal application filed by Dilip Bhagchand Jethani on June 15, 2026. The court issued notice to the respondents (State of Maharashtra through PS Balapur, Akola and another) returnable on July 6, 2026. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service of notice on behalf of the State, and the matter was adjourned for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts