VISHUN RANGRAO RANMALE, vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THR PSO, KHANDALA, TQ. PUSAD, DIST. YAVATMAL — APL/1282/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 528. Next hearing: 19th June 2026.
CNR: HCBM040181622026
e-Filing Number
11-06-2026
Filing Number
APL/5759/2026
Filing Date
11-Jun-2026
Registration No
APL/1282/2026
Registration Date
16-Jun-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice M. W. Chandwani
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice M. W. Chandwani
Bench Type
Single
Category
CRIMINAL ( 9 )
Sub-Category
QUASHING OF FIR C.R., CHARGE SHEET OR PROSECUTION ( 26 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal
Last updated 20-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.VISHUN RANGRAO RANMALE,
Adv. ANJANA MOTIRAM RAUT, ADV. FOR APPLICANT NO. 1 TO
-
2.RANGRAO AMBAJI RANMALE,
Adv. RAUT ANJANA MOTIRAM
-
3.SAU. CHANDRABHAGA RANGRAO RANMALE,
Adv. RAUT ANJANA MOTIRAM
-
4.ARCHANA ULHAS KHOKALE
Adv. RAUT ANJANA MOTIRAM
-
5.DYANESHWAR RANGRAO RANMALE
Adv. RAUT ANJANA MOTIRAM
-
6.KAILAS RAJARAM RITHE.
Adv. RAUT ANJANA MOTIRAM
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THR PSO, KHANDALA, TQ. PUSAD, DIST. YAVATMAL
-
2.SAU. SHIVANI VISHNU RANMALE,
Case History
-
19-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
25-Jun-2026
—
-
19-Jun-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice M. W. ChandwaniView PDF
Case APL/1282/2026 Summary: The Nagpur Bench of the Bombay High Court issued notice to the respondents on June 19, 2026, returnable on July 10, 2026. The applicants did not appear in court. The State waived service of notice, and applicants were permitted to serve the second respondent through all lawful private modes in addition to regular service. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
11-Jun-2026
Case filed
Registration No. APL/1282/2026
Case APL/1282/2026 Summary: The Nagpur Bench of the Bombay High Court issued notice to the respondents on June 19, 2026, returnable on July 10, 2026. The applicants did not appear in court. The State waived service of notice, and applicants were permitted to serve the second respondent through all lawful private modes in addition to regular service. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts