WASEEM ALAM SIDDIQUI vs MAHARASHTRA STATE ELECTRICITY DISTRIBUTION LTD., THR. MANAGING DIRECTOR, MUMBAI AND ORS. — WP/4619/2026

Case under Electricity Act Section 226. Next hearing: 12th June 2026.

Next hearing 12-Jun-2026

CNR: HCBM040181432026

Filing Number

WP/12389/2026

Filing Date

11-Jun-2026

Registration No

WP/4619/2026

Registration Date

12-Jun-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil S. Kilor , Hon'ble Shri Justice Raj D. Wakode

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil S. Kilor , Hon'ble Shri Justice Raj D. Wakode

Bench Type

Division

Judicial Branch

Civil

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Electricity Act Section 226
Constitution of India

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.WASEEM ALAM SIDDIQUI

    Adv. NIRAV S. PADIA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MAHARASHTRA STATE ELECTRICITY DISTRIBUTION LTD., THR. MANAGING DIRECTOR, MUMBAI AND ORS.

  2. 2.THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER/ EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, NAGPUR

  3. 3.ASSISTANT ENGINEER, NAGPUR

Case History

  1. 12-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 25-Jun-2026

    —

  3. 12-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil S. Kilor,hon'ble Shri Justice Raj D. WakodeView PDF

    Case Summary: WP/4619/2026 Outcome: The writ petition was admitted and notice issued to respondents (returnable 09/07/2026). The High Court directed Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Co. Ltd. to immediately restore electricity supply to the petitioner's two consumer accounts, subject to the petition's final outcome. This interim relief was granted after the petitioner's counsel undertook to deposit 50% of the disputed demand (Rs.3,99,880) within two weeks and the remaining 50% within three weeks if the petition fails. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 11-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/4619/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WP/4619/2026 Outcome: The writ petition was admitted and notice issued to respondents (returnable 09/07/2026). The High Court directed Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Co. Ltd. to immediately restore electricity supply to the petitioner's two consumer accounts, subject to the petition's final outcome. This interim relief was granted after the petitioner's counsel undertook to deposit 50% of the disputed demand (Rs.3,99,880) within two weeks and the remaining 50% within three weeks if the petition fails. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case