SAU. LUMBINI MAHESH KALARE vs THE ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER, NAGPUR DIVISION, NAGPUR AND ORS. — WP/4621/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226,227. Next hearing: 12th June 2026.

Next hearing 12-Jun-2026

CNR: HCBM040180642026

Filing Number

WP/12336/2026

Filing Date

11-Jun-2026

Registration No

WP/4621/2026

Registration Date

12-Jun-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Rohit Wasudeo Joshi

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Rohit Wasudeo Joshi

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226,227
Village Panchayats Act (Maharashtra)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SAU. LUMBINI MAHESH KALARE

    Adv. BHOJRAJ SITARAM DHANDALE

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER, NAGPUR DIVISION, NAGPUR AND ORS.

  2. 2.THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, ZILLA PARISHAD, NAGPUR

  3. 3.VIKAS PURUSHOTTAM ZADE

  4. 4.DHARMARAJ GANPATRAO BHAWANKUDE

  5. 5.SANTOSH KISAN AMBILDUKE

Case History

  1. 12-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 23-Jun-2026

    —

  3. 12-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Rohit Wasudeo JoshiView PDF

    Case Summary: WP 4621/2026 Sarpanch Lumbini Mahesh Kalare challenged removal proceedings against her under Section 39 of the Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959. The court found prima facie merit in her contention that the inquiry report was prepared without providing her copies of documents or affording adequate hearing opportunity, despite statutory requirement. The court stayed the removal proceedings pending next hearing, scheduled for 29/06/2026, noting procedural irregularities in the inquiry process. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 11-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/4621/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WP 4621/2026 Sarpanch Lumbini Mahesh Kalare challenged removal proceedings against her under Section 39 of the Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959. The court found prima facie merit in her contention that the inquiry report was prepared without providing her copies of documents or affording adequate hearing opportunity, despite statutory requirement. The court stayed the removal proceedings pending next hearing, scheduled for 29/06/2026, noting procedural irregularities in the inquiry process. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case