SHUBHAM BABULAL JAISWAL AND OTHERS vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, STATE EXCISE DEPARTMENT, THR. COMMISSIONER, AND OTHERS — WP/4603/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226,227. Next hearing: 17th June 2026.

Next hearing 17-Jun-2026

CNR: HCBM040180582026

Filing Number

WP/12330/2026

Filing Date

11-Jun-2026

Registration No

WP/4603/2026

Registration Date

11-Jun-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Rohit Wasudeo Joshi

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Rohit Wasudeo Joshi

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil

Last updated 17-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226,227
Bombay Prohibition Act

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SHUBHAM BABULAL JAISWAL AND OTHERS

    Adv. A.M. GHARE,PARIMAL ULHAS KAVISHWAR,PARIMAL ULHAS KAVISHWAR, ,PARIMAL ULHAS KAVISHWAR

  2. 2.KAMALNAYAN LAXMIKANT JAISWAL

  3. 3.GAURAV ANIL JAISWAL

  4. 4.MRS. SARIKA SANTOSH JAISWAL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, STATE EXCISE DEPARTMENT, THR. COMMISSIONER, AND OTHERS

  2. 2.THE COLLECTOR YAVATMAL

  3. 3.THE CHIEF OFFICER AUTHORITY ELECTION OFFICER, NAGAR PANCHAYAT MAHAGAON, YAVATMAL

  4. 4.THE SUPERINTENDENT STATE EXCISE DEPARTMENT YAVATMAL

  5. 5.THE INSPECTOR STATE EXCISE DEPARTMENT PUSAD

  6. 6.TAHSILDAR MAHAGAON YAVATMAL

Case History

  1. 17-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 23-Jun-2026

    —

  3. 17-Jun-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  4. 15-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Rohit Wasudeo JoshiView PDF

    Case Summary: In WP 4603/2026, the Nagpur Bench of Bombay High Court heard arguments on 15/06/2026 where petitioners' counsel alleged that an impugned order was passed without affording them a hearing. The court directed the State's AGP to seek instructions and make a statement. The case was adjourned to 17/06/2026 for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  5. 11-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/4603/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: In WP 4603/2026, the Nagpur Bench of Bombay High Court heard arguments on 15/06/2026 where petitioners' counsel alleged that an impugned order was passed without affording them a hearing. The court directed the State's AGP to seek instructions and make a statement. The case was adjourned to 17/06/2026 for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case