ASRAR AHMED SAFAT MOHAMMED KHAN vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR PS., PS MORSHI, AMRAVATI RURAL, AMRAVATI — ABA/487/2026

Case under Criminal Procedure Code (Cr.pc) Section 438. Next hearing: 12th June 2026.

CNR: HCBM040180282026

Next Hearing

12th June 2026

Filing Number

ABA/5711/2026

Filing Date

11-06-2026

Registration No

ABA/487/2026

Registration Date

11-06-2026

Judge

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE PRAVIN S. PATIL

Coram

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE PRAVIN S. PATIL

Bench Type

Single

Category

CRIMINAL ( 9 )

Sub-Category

ANTICIPATORY BAIL ( 4 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal

Acts & Sections

Criminal Procedure Code (Cr.pc) Section 438
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 140(2),308(5),336(3),61(2)

Petitioner(s)

ASRAR AHMED SAFAT MOHAMMED KHAN

Adv. SURESH GOVINDPRASAD SHUKLA,ABHISHEK S. SHUKLA,ABHISHEK S. SHUKLA, ,M.S. RATHOD,ABHISHEK S. SHUKLA

Respondent(s)

STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR PS (Police Station)., PS (Police Station) MORSHI, AMRAVATI RURAL, AMRAVATI

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE PRAVIN S. PATIL

12-06-2026

Orders

12-06-2026
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE PRAVIN S. PATIL

Case Summary: ABA/487/2026 Interim bail granted. Applicant Asrar Ahmed Safat Mohammed Khan sought protection in a scrap material transaction fraud case (Crime No. 240/2026, PS Morshi, Amravati) involving alleged non-payment of Rs.17,81,446. The High Court found procedural defects—the police failed to provide a copy of the complaint when registering the FIR—and granted interim protection: release on PR bond of Rs.25,000 with surety, bi-weekly police station attendance, cooperation with investigation, and restrictions on tampering with evidence. Case returnable after three weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: ABA/487/2026 Interim bail granted. Applicant Asrar Ahmed Safat Mohammed Khan sought protection in a scrap material transaction fraud case (Crime No. 240/2026, PS Morshi, Amravati) involving alleged non-payment of Rs.17,81,446. The High Court found procedural defects—the police failed to provide a copy of the complaint when registering the FIR—and granted interim protection: release on PR bond of Rs.25,000 with surety, bi-weekly police station attendance, cooperation with investigation, and restrictions on tampering with evidence. Case returnable after three weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case