SANTOSH GARG WO SHRI MADAN KUMAR GARG vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA — APL/1250/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 528. Next hearing: 29th June 2026.

Next hearing 29-Jun-2026

CNR: HCBM040180022026

e-Filing Number

10-06-2026

Filing Number

APL/5693/2026

Filing Date

11-Jun-2026

Registration No

APL/1250/2026

Registration Date

11-Jun-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice M. W. Chandwani

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice M. W. Chandwani

Bench Type

Single

Category

CRIMINAL ( 9 )

Sub-Category

QUASHING OF FIR C.R., CHARGE SHEET OR PROSECUTION ( 26 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal

Last updated 17-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 528

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SANTOSH GARG WO SHRI MADAN KUMAR GARG

    Adv. CHETAN S. DHORE,P.N. TAYDE,P.N. TAYDE, ,YASH SANJAY BANGALE,P.N. TAYDE

  2. 2.SATPAL GARG SO SHRI RAM SWAROOP GARG

    Adv. ANUP SHANKARRAO DHORE

  3. 3.MS CENT CURE PVT LTD

    Adv. ANUP SHANKARRAO DHORE

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Case History

  1. 29-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 29-Jun-2026

    Applications For Admission Fresh (Criminal Side Matters)

    Hon'ble Shri Justice M. W. Chandwani

  3. 22-Jun-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  4. 15-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice M. W. ChandwaniView PDF

    The Nagpur High Court adjourned the criminal application filed by Santosh Garg and others challenging a drug prosecution initiated by the Drugs Inspector, Amravati. The applicant contended that mandatory procedures under the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 were not followed during the seizure and initiation of prosecution regarding "Pantakos-40 Tablet." Notice was issued to the State, returnable on 29.06.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  5. 11-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. APL/1250/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Nagpur High Court adjourned the criminal application filed by Santosh Garg and others challenging a drug prosecution initiated by the Drugs Inspector, Amravati. The applicant contended that mandatory procedures under the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 were not followed during the seizure and initiation of prosecution regarding "Pantakos-40 Tablet." Notice was issued to the State, returnable on 29.06.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case