RANJANA SUNIL ZAMBADE vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THR. SECRETARY INDUSTRIES, ENERGY AND LABOUR DEPARTMENT, MANTRALAYA, MUMBAI — WP/4585/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Next hearing: 12th June 2026.
CNR: HCBM040179982026
Next Hearing
12th June 2026
Filing Number
WP/12303/2026
Filing Date
11-06-2026
Registration No
WP/4585/2026
Registration Date
11-06-2026
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ANIL S. KILOR , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAJ D. WAKODE
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ANIL S. KILOR , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAJ D. WAKODE
Bench Type
Division
Judicial Branch
Civil
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
RANJANA SUNIL ZAMBADE
Adv. AKSHAYA SUDAME,SARANSH HARISH WASNIK,SARANSH HARISH WASNIK, ,FIDVI IBRAHIM ABID,ABHISHEK SANJAY SONAR,UTKARSH Y. KHOBRAGADE,AKHILESH POTNIS,SARANSH HARISH WASNIK
Respondent(s)
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THR. SECRETARY INDUSTRIES, ENERGY AND LABOUR DEPARTMENT, MANTRALAYA, MUMBAI
MAHARASHTRA INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION THR. CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER UDYOG SARATHI, MUMBAI
THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, AMRAVATI
THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, AMRAVATI
THE DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT AGRICULTURAL OFFICER, AMRAVATI
THE SUB DIVISIONAL OFFICER AND LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER AMRAVATI
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ANIL S. KILOR , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAJ D. WAKODE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 25-06-2026 |
Orders
Case Summary: The Nagpur Bench of Bombay High Court issued notice to respondents in Ranjana Sunil Zambade's writ petition on June 12, 2026, with a returnable date of July 28, 2026. The petitioner was permitted to serve remaining respondents via private mode in addition to regular service, with an affidavit of service required by the next date; failure to comply would result in a Rs. 500 cost deposit to the Public Welfare Account. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: The Nagpur Bench of Bombay High Court issued notice to respondents in Ranjana Sunil Zambade's writ petition on June 12, 2026, with a returnable date of July 28, 2026. The petitioner was permitted to serve remaining respondents via private mode in addition to regular service, with an affidavit of service required by the next date; failure to comply would result in a Rs. 500 cost deposit to the Public Welfare Account. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts