MESHRAMBABA MATSYA VYAVASAY SAHAKARI SANSTHA LTD. THR. SEC. SANTOSH M. SURDUSE SUSHANT PRABHUNE vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THR. PRINCIPAL SEC. DEPT OF FISHERIES AND ORS. — WP/4673/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Next hearing: 21st July 2026.
CNR: HCBM040179642026
Filing Number
WP/12273/2026
Filing Date
10-Jun-2026
Registration No
WP/4673/2026
Registration Date
15-Jun-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil S. Kilor , Hon'ble Shri Justice Raj D. Wakode
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil S. Kilor , Hon'ble Shri Justice Raj D. Wakode
Bench Type
Division
Judicial Branch
Civil
Last updated 18-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.MESHRAMBABA MATSYA VYAVASAY SAHAKARI SANSTHA LTD. THR. SEC. SANTOSH M. SURDUSE SUSHANT PRABHUNE
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THR. PRINCIPAL SEC. DEPT OF FISHERIES AND ORS.
-
2.MAHARASHTRA FISHERIES DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD., MUMBAI
-
3.M/S BREEZE FISHERIES THR. PROPRIETOR MOHAMMAD BILAL KHAN
Case History
-
21-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
21-Jul-2026
Fresh Admission (Civil Side Matters)
Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil S. Kilor , Hon'ble Shri Justice Raj D. Wakode
-
25-Jun-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
17-Jun-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil S. Kilor,hon'ble Shri Justice Raj D. WakodeView PDF
WP/4673/2026 Summary The Nagpur High Court bench admitted a writ petition by MeshramBaba Matsya Vyavasay Sahakari Sanstha Ltd. against the State of Maharashtra and others, and adjourned the case for hearing on 21/07/2026. The court permitted the petitioner to serve remaining respondents via private mode and directed filing of an affidavit by next date, with a cost penalty of ₹500 for non-compliance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Jun-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WP/4673/2026
WP/4673/2026 Summary The Nagpur High Court bench admitted a writ petition by MeshramBaba Matsya Vyavasay Sahakari Sanstha Ltd. against the State of Maharashtra and others, and adjourned the case for hearing on 21/07/2026. The court permitted the petitioner to serve remaining respondents via private mode and directed filing of an affidavit by next date, with a cost penalty of ₹500 for non-compliance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts