M/S SUKHYOG SERVICES THR. PARTNERS MADHAV D. DESHPANDE AND ORS. vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THR. SECRETARY MINISTRY OF URBAN DEVP. AND ANR. — WP/4592/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226,227. Next hearing: 12th June 2026.

Next hearing 12-Jun-2026

CNR: HCBM040179362026

Filing Number

WP/12250/2026

Filing Date

10-Jun-2026

Registration No

WP/4592/2026

Registration Date

11-Jun-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil S. Kilor , Hon'ble Shri Justice Raj D. Wakode

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil S. Kilor , Hon'ble Shri Justice Raj D. Wakode

Bench Type

Division

Judicial Branch

Civil

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226,227
Securitisation & Reconstruction of Finiancial Assets Act

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.M/S SUKHYOG SERVICES THR. PARTNERS MADHAV D. DESHPANDE AND ORS.

    Adv. DEEP N. KARAMCHANDANI,LEENA V. SADHWANI,LEENA V. SADHWANI, ,SHANTANU M. PANDE,NARENDRA KARAMCHANDANI,BHUMIKA D. SARDA,LEENA V. SADHWANI

  2. 2.SHRI MOHAN PRABHAKAR DESHPANDE

  3. 3.SHRI. ASHISH SHASHIKANT PANSE

  4. 4.SHRI SIB NARAYAN BHOLANATH GORAI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THR. SECRETARY MINISTRY OF URBAN DEVP. AND ANR.

  2. 2.CANARA BANK A FINANCIAL INSTITUTION, THR. AUTHORISED OFFICER PRABHU A ASSTT. GENERAL MANAGAR

Case History

  1. 12-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 25-Jun-2026

    —

  3. 12-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil S. Kilor,hon'ble Shri Justice Raj D. WakodeView PDF

    Case Summary: WP/4592/2026 Outcome: The writ petition was admitted for hearing on a restricted basis. The High Court of Bombay (Nagpur Bench) rejected the respondent bank's maintainability objection and issued notice to respondents, directing them to file responses returnable on 16.07.2026. The court clarified that Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act cannot be adjudicated by the Debts Recovery Tribunal, making the present writ petition maintainable to challenge the lower court's order dated 07.03.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 10-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/4592/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WP/4592/2026 Outcome: The writ petition was admitted for hearing on a restricted basis. The High Court of Bombay (Nagpur Bench) rejected the respondent bank's maintainability objection and issued notice to respondents, directing them to file responses returnable on 16.07.2026. The court clarified that Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act cannot be adjudicated by the Debts Recovery Tribunal, making the present writ petition maintainable to challenge the lower court's order dated 07.03.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case