KAMLAKAR ANKUSH MESHRAM vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THR. PRINCIPAL, SEC. URBAN DEVL. DEPT. AND ANR. — WP/4683/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 226,227. Next hearing: 28th July 2026.
CNR: HCBM040179322026
Filing Number
WP/12247/2026
Filing Date
10-Jun-2026
Registration No
WP/4683/2026
Registration Date
16-Jun-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil S. Kilor , Hon'ble Shri Justice Raj D. Wakode
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil S. Kilor , Hon'ble Shri Justice Raj D. Wakode
Bench Type
Division
Judicial Branch
Civil
Last updated 18-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.KAMLAKAR ANKUSH MESHRAM
Adv. HARISH DAMODHAR DANGRE,AYUSHI DANGRE,AYUSHI DANGRE, ,BHAVYA C. DHRUV,ABHISHEK TRIPATHI,AYUSHI DANGRE
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THR. PRINCIPAL, SEC. URBAN DEVL. DEPT. AND ANR.
-
2.EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, NAGPUR IMPROVEMENT, NAGPUR
Case History
-
28-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
28-Jul-2026
Fresh Admission (Civil Side Matters)
Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil S. Kilor , Hon'ble Shri Justice Raj D. Wakode
-
25-Jun-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
17-Jun-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil S. Kilor,hon'ble Shri Justice Raj D. WakodeView PDF
Case Summary: WP/4683/2026 The Nagpur Bench of the Bombay High Court heard the writ petition filed by Kamlakar Ankush Meshram against the State of Maharashtra and the Executive Engineer, Nagpur Improvement. The Court issued notice to the respondents, returnable on 28/07/2026, with both respondents waiving service. The case was adjourned for substantive hearing on the next date, with directions to remove any office objections beforehand. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Jun-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WP/4683/2026
Case Summary: WP/4683/2026 The Nagpur Bench of the Bombay High Court heard the writ petition filed by Kamlakar Ankush Meshram against the State of Maharashtra and the Executive Engineer, Nagpur Improvement. The Court issued notice to the respondents, returnable on 28/07/2026, with both respondents waiving service. The case was adjourned for substantive hearing on the next date, with directions to remove any office objections beforehand. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts