BRIJLAL BIYANI SHIKSHA SAMITI THR. PRESIDENT OMPRAKASH S. LADDHA vs THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER/VICE PRESIDENT, MAH. HOUSING AND AREA DEVELOPMENT AUTH. AND ANR. — WP/4594/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Next hearing: 12th June 2026.

Next hearing 12-Jun-2026

CNR: HCBM040178602026

Filing Number

WP/12200/2026

Filing Date

10-Jun-2026

Registration No

WP/4594/2026

Registration Date

11-Jun-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil S. Kilor , Hon'ble Shri Justice Raj D. Wakode

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil S. Kilor , Hon'ble Shri Justice Raj D. Wakode

Bench Type

Division

Judicial Branch

Civil

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226
Mah. Housing & Area Devolopment Act

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.BRIJLAL BIYANI SHIKSHA SAMITI THR. PRESIDENT OMPRAKASH S. LADDHA

    Adv. SANKET RAMKRISHNA CHARPE,VAIBHAV SUNIL BORKAR,VAIBHAV SUNIL BORKAR, ,VAIBHAV SUNIL BORKAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER/VICE PRESIDENT, MAH. HOUSING AND AREA DEVELOPMENT AUTH. AND ANR.

  2. 2.THE CHIEF OFFICER, AMRAVATI HOUSING AND AREA DEVELOPMENT BOARD, AMRAVATI

Case History

  1. 12-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 25-Jun-2026

    —

  3. 12-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil S. Kilor,hon'ble Shri Justice Raj D. WakodeView PDF

    Case Summary: WP/4594/2026 The High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Nagpur Bench issued notice to the respondents on 12th June 2026, returnable on 15.07.2026. The petitioner is permitted to serve respondents through private mode in addition to regular service, with an affidavit of service required by the next date; failure to comply results in a Rs.500 cost deposit to the Public Welfare Account. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 10-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/4594/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WP/4594/2026 The High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Nagpur Bench issued notice to the respondents on 12th June 2026, returnable on 15.07.2026. The petitioner is permitted to serve respondents through private mode in addition to regular service, with an affidavit of service required by the next date; failure to comply results in a Rs.500 cost deposit to the Public Welfare Account. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case