SOU. SATYABHAMA W/O RAM DAHAKE vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA,THROUGH DISTRICT DEPUTY REGISTRAR, COOPERATIVE SOCIETIES, BULDHANA AND OTHERS. — WP/4597/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 226,227. Next hearing: 12th June 2026.
CNR: HCBM040177822026
Filing Number
WP/12132/2026
Filing Date
10-Jun-2026
Registration No
WP/4597/2026
Registration Date
11-Jun-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil S. Kilor , Hon'ble Shri Justice Raj D. Wakode
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil S. Kilor , Hon'ble Shri Justice Raj D. Wakode
Bench Type
Division
Judicial Branch
Civil
Last updated 14-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SOU. SATYABHAMA W/O RAM DAHAKE
Adv. R.K. THAKKAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF MAHARASHTRA,THROUGH DISTRICT DEPUTY REGISTRAR, COOPERATIVE SOCIETIES, BULDHANA AND OTHERS.
-
2.THE ASSISTANT REGISTRAR CO-OPERATIVE, BULDHANA
-
3.THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, ANURADHA URBAN COOPERATIVE BANK LTD. BULDHANA
-
4.THE RECOVERY OFFICER, ANURADHA URBAN COOPERATIVE BANK LTD., BULDHANA
Case History
-
12-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
25-Jun-2026
—
-
12-Jun-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil S. Kilor,hon'ble Shri Justice Raj D. WakodeView PDF
Case Summary: The Nagpur Bench of the Bombay High Court heard Writ Petition No. 4597/2026 filed by Satyabhama W/O Ram Dahake against the State of Maharashtra and cooperative authorities. The court issued notice to respondents returnable on 13th July 2026, allowed the petitioner to serve remaining respondents via private mode of service, and directed filing of service affidavit by next date with a penalty of Rs. 500 for non-compliance. Office objections were directed to be resolved before the next hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Jun-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WP/4597/2026
Case Summary: The Nagpur Bench of the Bombay High Court heard Writ Petition No. 4597/2026 filed by Satyabhama W/O Ram Dahake against the State of Maharashtra and cooperative authorities. The court issued notice to respondents returnable on 13th July 2026, allowed the petitioner to serve remaining respondents via private mode of service, and directed filing of service affidavit by next date with a penalty of Rs. 500 for non-compliance. Office objections were directed to be resolved before the next hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts