SHRIKANT DILIP GAIKWAD vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH PSO PS AWADHUTWADI DISTRICT YAVATMAL. — APL/1236/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 528. Next hearing: 11th June 2026.

Next hearing 11-Jun-2026

CNR: HCBM040177692026

e-Filing Number

09-06-2026

Filing Number

APL/5644/2026

Filing Date

10-Jun-2026

Registration No

APL/1236/2026

Registration Date

10-Jun-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice M. W. Chandwani

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice M. W. Chandwani

Bench Type

Single

Category

CRIMINAL ( 9 )

Sub-Category

QUASHING OF FIR C.R., CHARGE SHEET OR PROSECUTION ( 26 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal

Last updated 12-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 528
Indian Penal Code (I.p.c) Section 376(2)(N), 417

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SHRIKANT DILIP GAIKWAD

    Adv. MIR NAGMAN ALI,PARTH JOSHI,PARTH JOSHI, ,UTKARSH M. SHENDE,RAJA REBATIRAMAN SINHA,PARTH JOSHI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH PSO PS (Police Station) AWADHUTWADI DISTRICT YAVATMAL.

  2. 2.XYZ VICTIM CRIME NO 418 OF 2026

Case History

  1. 11-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 19-Jun-2026

    —

  3. 11-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice M. W. ChandwaniView PDF

    The High Court of Bombay, Nagpur Bench, heard the criminal application of Shrikant Dilip Gaikwad on 11.06.2026. The applicant's counsel argued that the relationship with the complainant (non-applicant no. 2) was consensual in nature and that the complainant is a major who filed the complaint after maintaining the relationship for two years. The court adjourned the matter, issuing notice to the non-applicants returnable on 09.07.2026, with the State waiving service of notice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 10-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. APL/1236/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Bombay, Nagpur Bench, heard the criminal application of Shrikant Dilip Gaikwad on 11.06.2026. The applicant's counsel argued that the relationship with the complainant (non-applicant no. 2) was consensual in nature and that the complainant is a major who filed the complaint after maintaining the relationship for two years. The court adjourned the matter, issuing notice to the non-applicants returnable on 09.07.2026, with the State waiving service of notice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case