PRAMOD S/O BICCHU PENDAM vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, SECY., DEPARTMENT OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY, MUMBAI AND ORS. — WP/4572/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226,227. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 11th June 2026.

CNR: HCBM040177322026

CASE DISPOSED

Next Hearing

25th June 2026

Filing Number

WP/12091/2026

Filing Date

09-06-2026

Registration No

WP/4572/2026

Registration Date

10-06-2026

Judge

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ANIL S. KILOR , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAJ D. WAKODE

Coram

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ANIL S. KILOR , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAJ D. WAKODE

Bench Type

Division

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

11th June 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226,227
Ma. Agri. Products Marketing Act 1964
Agricultural Produce Marketing (Development and Regulation) (Amendment) Act (Maharashtra)

Petitioner(s)

PRAMOD S/O BICCHU PENDAM

Adv. A.M. CHANDEKAR,GANESH G. AMRUTKAR,GANESH G. AMRUTKAR, ,SANDEEP NARESH SINGH,PRANIT J. VAIRAGADE,RUSHIKESH RAVINDRA MADDALWAR,GANESH G. AMRUTKAR

Respondent(s)

STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, SECY., DEPARTMENT OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY, MUMBAI AND ORS.

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ANIL S. KILOR , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAJ D. WAKODE

25-06-2026

Orders

11-06-2026
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ANIL S. KILOR,HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAJ D. WAKODE

Summary of WP/4572/2026 The High Court dismissed Pramod's writ petition challenging the APMC Aheri Chairman election scheduled for 11 June 2026. The petitioner objected to a disqualified director (Smt Malutai Rama Ishtam) being included in the voters' list, but the court declined to interfere, holding that High Courts should not intervene in ongoing elections. The court allowed the petitioner to raise objections during the election and subsequently challenge results through election petition if necessary. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of WP/4572/2026 The High Court dismissed Pramod's writ petition challenging the APMC Aheri Chairman election scheduled for 11 June 2026. The petitioner objected to a disqualified director (Smt Malutai Rama Ishtam) being included in the voters' list, but the court declined to interfere, holding that High Courts should not intervene in ongoing elections. The court allowed the petitioner to raise objections during the election and subsequently challenge results through election petition if necessary. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Constitution of India Ma. Agri. Products Marketing Act 1964 Agricultural Produce Marketing (Development and Regulation) (Amendment) Act (Maharashtra) All acts →

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case