RAVINDRA RANGNATH NADARKAR AND ORS. vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THR. PRIN. SECRETARY RURAL DEVELOPMENT AND ORS. — WP/4601/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Next hearing: 12th June 2026.
CNR: HCBM040176952026
Filing Number
WP/12062/2026
Filing Date
09-Jun-2026
Registration No
WP/4601/2026
Registration Date
11-Jun-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil L. Pansare , Hon'ble Shri Justice Rajnish R. Vyas
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil L. Pansare , Hon'ble Shri Justice Rajnish R. Vyas
Bench Type
Division
Judicial Branch
Civil
Last updated 14-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.RAVINDRA RANGNATH NADARKAR AND ORS.
Adv. RUGVED BHASKARRAO DHORE,NANDINI HARESH PATEL,NANDINI HARESH PATEL, ,NANDINI HARESH PATEL
-
2.BALIRAM MAHADU PANZADE
-
3.VINAYAK GOPALRAO DHONDGE
-
4.RAJESH PRATAPRAO THENG
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THR. PRIN. SECRETARY RURAL DEVELOPMENT AND ORS.
-
2.THE EDUCATION OFFICER (PRIMARY) ZILLA PARISHAD, BULDHANA
-
3.THE ZILLA PARISHAD, BULDHANA, THR. CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
-
4.THE DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION (PRIMARY), STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, PUNE
Case History
-
12-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
25-Jun-2026
—
-
12-Jun-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil L. Pansare,hon'ble Shri Justice Rajnish R. VyasView PDF
Case Summary: Writ Petition No. 4601 of 2026 was heard on June 12, 2026, by the Nagpur Bench of the Bombay High Court. The court issued notice to respondents returnable in two weeks, with the Advocate General waiving service for Respondents 1 and 4. The petitioner was directed to serve all respondents through all permissible modes including speed post and file an affidavit of service. The petition stands adjourned pending response. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
09-Jun-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WP/4601/2026
Case Summary: Writ Petition No. 4601 of 2026 was heard on June 12, 2026, by the Nagpur Bench of the Bombay High Court. The court issued notice to respondents returnable in two weeks, with the Advocate General waiving service for Respondents 1 and 4. The petitioner was directed to serve all respondents through all permissible modes including speed post and file an affidavit of service. The petition stands adjourned pending response. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts