ANIL S/O TULARAM KERAMI AND ANOTHER vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THR. SECY., RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, MUMBAI AND ORS. — WP/4561/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 226,227. Next hearing: 30th June 2026.
CNR: HCBM040175902026
Filing Number
WP/11978/2026
Filing Date
09-Jun-2026
Registration No
WP/4561/2026
Registration Date
10-Jun-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil S. Kilor , Hon'ble Shri Justice Raj D. Wakode
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil S. Kilor , Hon'ble Shri Justice Raj D. Wakode
Bench Type
Division
Judicial Branch
Civil
Last updated 12-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.ANIL S/O TULARAM KERAMI AND ANOTHER
Adv. SHRAVAN S. TARAM
-
2.MOHAN S/O GANPAT PURAM
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THR. SECY., RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, MUMBAI AND ORS.
-
2.THE ELECTION COMMISSION OF INDIA, NEW DELHI, THR. CHIEF ELECTION COMMISSIONER
-
3.THE STATE ELECTION COMMISSON MUMBAI, THR. CHIEF ELECTION COMMISSIONER
Case History
-
30-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
30-Jun-2026
Fresh Admission (Civil Side Matters)
Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil S. Kilor , Hon'ble Shri Justice Raj D. Wakode
-
25-Jun-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
11-Jun-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil S. Kilor,hon'ble Shri Justice Raj D. WakodeView PDF
Case Summary: In WP/4561/2026, petitioners Anil S/o Tularam Kerami and another challenged the election program for Member of Maharashtra Legislative Council. The High Court of Bombay, Nagpur Bench, found the matter pertained to an election dispute and transferred the writ petition to the Principal Seat at Bombay for appropriate jurisdiction. The petition was not decided on merits but redirected procedurally. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
09-Jun-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WP/4561/2026
Case Summary: In WP/4561/2026, petitioners Anil S/o Tularam Kerami and another challenged the election program for Member of Maharashtra Legislative Council. The High Court of Bombay, Nagpur Bench, found the matter pertained to an election dispute and transferred the writ petition to the Principal Seat at Bombay for appropriate jurisdiction. The petition was not decided on merits but redirected procedurally. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts