GENERAL MANAGER, CENTRAL RAILWAY THROUGH DY. CHIEF EXECUTIVE ENGINEER (CONSTRUCTION), MUMBAI vs SMT. JYOTSNA ANANT BHONDU AND OTHERS Advocate - SAWAN ALASPURKAR — CAF/2426/2026

Case under Other Act Section 00. Disposed: Contested--C.A. Disposed off on 17th June 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 02-Jul-2026

CNR: HCBM040175552026

Filing Number

CAF/11945/2026

Filing Date

08-Jun-2026

Registration No

CAF/2426/2026

Registration Date

15-Jun-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sushil M. Ghodeswar

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sushil M. Ghodeswar

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

17-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--C.A. Disposed off

Last updated 18-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Other Act Section 00

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GENERAL MANAGER, CENTRAL RAILWAY THROUGH DY. CHIEF EXECUTIVE ENGINEER (CONSTRUCTION), MUMBAI

    Adv. NITIN P. LAMBAT

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SMT. JYOTSNA ANANT BHONDU AND OTHERS Advocate - SAWAN ALASPURKAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 02-Jul-2026

  3. 17-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sushil M. GhodeswarView PDF

    Case Summary: The High Court of Bombay (Nagpur Bench) granted permission to withdraw Rs. 1,54,73,313/- deposited by Central Railway as enhanced compensation. The court allowed respondent no. 2 to represent the 80-year-old claimant (respondent no. 1) via Special Power of Attorney and video conferencing for verification, with withdrawn funds to be deposited in a joint account. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 08-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CAF/2426/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: The High Court of Bombay (Nagpur Bench) granted permission to withdraw Rs. 1,54,73,313/- deposited by Central Railway as enhanced compensation. The court allowed respondent no. 2 to represent the 80-year-old claimant (respondent no. 1) via Special Power of Attorney and video conferencing for verification, with withdrawn funds to be deposited in a joint account. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case