PRADIPKUMAR POPATLAL VAKHARIA vs HOMEOPATHIC EDUCATION SOCIETY, AKOT AKOLA — WP/4543/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Next hearing: 09th June 2026.

Next hearing 09-Jun-2026

CNR: HCBM040174782026

e-Filing Number

08-06-2026

Filing Number

WP/11877/2026

Filing Date

08-Jun-2026

Registration No

WP/4543/2026

Registration Date

08-Jun-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil S. Kilor , Hon'ble Shri Justice Raj D. Wakode

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil S. Kilor , Hon'ble Shri Justice Raj D. Wakode

Bench Type

Division

Judicial Branch

Civil

Last updated 11-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226
Bombay Public Trust Act Section 227

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PRADIPKUMAR POPATLAL VAKHARIA

    Adv. ABHINAV R. SAXENA, ,ANUP H. LOHIYA,SHILPA O. TAPDIYA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.HOMEOPATHIC EDUCATION SOCIETY, AKOT AKOLA

  2. 2.THE JOINT CHARITY COMMISSIONER, AMRAVATI DIVISION, AMRAVATI

  3. 3.STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THR. SECRETARY, LAW AND JUDICIARY DEPARTMENT, MUMBAI

Case History

  1. 09-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 25-Jun-2026

    —

  3. 09-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil S. Kilor,hon'ble Shri Justice Raj D. WakodeView PDF

    Case Summary: WP/4543/2026 The Nagpur Bench of the Bombay High Court heard the writ petition on 9th June 2026 and issued notice to respondents returnable on 07.07.2026. The petitioner is permitted to serve remaining respondents through private mode in addition to regular service. Any auction proceedings are stayed pending the petition's outcome, and the Charity Commissioner is authorized to decide on the petitioner's objections in the interim. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 08-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/4543/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WP/4543/2026 The Nagpur Bench of the Bombay High Court heard the writ petition on 9th June 2026 and issued notice to respondents returnable on 07.07.2026. The petitioner is permitted to serve remaining respondents through private mode in addition to regular service. Any auction proceedings are stayed pending the petition's outcome, and the Charity Commissioner is authorized to decide on the petitioner's objections in the interim. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case