RAJENDRAPRASAD BODILAL SHAHU AND ORS. vs THE NAGPUR MUNICIPAL CORPORATION THR. MUNICIPAL COMMISSIONER AND ORS. — WP/4562/2026
Case under Mah. Regional Town Planning Act Section 226,227. Next hearing: 09th July 2026.
CNR: HCBM040174682026
Next Hearing
09th July 2026
Filing Number
WP/11868/2026
Filing Date
08-06-2026
Registration No
WP/4562/2026
Registration Date
10-06-2026
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ANIL S. KILOR , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAJ D. WAKODE
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ANIL S. KILOR , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAJ D. WAKODE
Bench Type
Division
Judicial Branch
Civil
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
RAJENDRAPRASAD BODILAL SHAHU AND ORS.
Adv. ASHWIN RAMRAO INGOLE
LAXMANPRASAD RAMAVATAR SHAHU
JITENDRA PANDURANG MOHADIKAR
Respondent(s)
THE NAGPUR MUNICIPAL CORPORATION THR. MUNICIPAL COMMISSIONER AND ORS.
THE COLLECTOR, NAGPUR
THE SUB DIVISIONAL OFFICER, NAGPUR
THE TAHSILDAR, NAGPUR CITY, NAGPUR
THE NAGPUR IMPROVEMENT TRUST, NAGPUR, THR. CHAIRMAN
THE CITY SURVEY OFFICER, NAGPUR 2 CITY, NAGPUR
MATRACHAYA GRUHA NIRMAN SAHKARI SANSTHA LTD., NAGPUR, THR. PRESIDENT TILAK CHUNNILAL GUPTA
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ANIL S. KILOR , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAJ D. WAKODE
FRESH ADMISSION (CIVIL SIDE MATTERS)
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 25-06-2026 | |
| 09-07-2026 | FRESH ADMISSION (CIVIL SIDE MATTERS) |
Orders
Case Summary: The writ petition filed by Rajendraprasad Bodilal Shahu and others against the Nagpur Municipal Corporation and others was adjourned. Notice was issued to respondents returnable on 09/07/2026, with some respondents waiving service. Petitioners were permitted to serve remaining respondents privately and must file an affidavit by the next date or deposit ₹500 as costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: The writ petition filed by Rajendraprasad Bodilal Shahu and others against the Nagpur Municipal Corporation and others was adjourned. Notice was issued to respondents returnable on 09/07/2026, with some respondents waiving service. Petitioners were permitted to serve remaining respondents privately and must file an affidavit by the next date or deposit ₹500 as costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts