WARDHA TAHSIL GO-DUGDHA UTPADAK SAHAKARI SANGH LTD WARDHA THR. PRESIDENT NILESH VASANTRAO PATIL vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR. FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION AND ORS. — WP/4542/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Next hearing: 09th June 2026.
CNR: HCBM040174482026
Next Hearing
09th June 2026
Filing Number
WP/11851/2026
Filing Date
08-06-2026
Registration No
WP/4542/2026
Registration Date
08-06-2026
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ANIL S. KILOR , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAJ D. WAKODE
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ANIL S. KILOR , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAJ D. WAKODE
Bench Type
Division
Judicial Branch
Civil
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
WARDHA TAHSIL GO-DUGDHA UTPADAK SAHAKARI SANGH LTD WARDHA THR. PRESIDENT NILESH VASANTRAO PATIL
Adv. SK BHOYAR
Respondent(s)
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR. FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION AND ORS.
THE COMMISSIONER OF FOOD SAFETY, FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION, MUMBAI
THE DESIGNATED OFFICER AND ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION, WARDHA
FOOD SAFETY OFFICER, FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION, WARDHA
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ANIL S. KILOR , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAJ D. WAKODE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 25-06-2026 |
Orders
Case Summary: The Nagpur Bench of the High Court of Bombay admitted the writ petition filed by Wardha Tahsil Go-Dugdha Utpadak Sahakari Sangh Ltd against the State of Maharashtra and food safety officials. The court issued notice to respondents returnable on 16.06.2026, with the AGP waiving service of notice on behalf of the State, and directed removal of any office objections before the next hearing date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: The Nagpur Bench of the High Court of Bombay admitted the writ petition filed by Wardha Tahsil Go-Dugdha Utpadak Sahakari Sangh Ltd against the State of Maharashtra and food safety officials. The court issued notice to respondents returnable on 16.06.2026, with the AGP waiving service of notice on behalf of the State, and directed removal of any office objections before the next hearing date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts