SHRIKANT JAGESHWAR PATIL AND OTHERS SACHIN S. DESHPANDE (FILED IN COURT), ,MOHAN MANIKRAO ATHAWALE,RAJLAXMI JUNGADE,NIKESH N. DHOKE vs VITTHAL SHIVRAM LONKAR AND ANOTHER — WP/4530/2026

Case under Tenancy and Agricultural Lands (Vidarbha Region) Act. (C.p.)maharashtra) Section 226,227. Next hearing: 23rd June 2026.

Next hearing 23-Jun-2026

CNR: HCBM040173372026

Filing Number

WP/11760/2026

Filing Date

05-Jun-2026

Registration No

WP/4530/2026

Registration Date

05-Jun-2026

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil

Last updated 06-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Tenancy and Agricultural Lands (Vidarbha Region) Act. (C.p.)maharashtra) Section 226,227
Constitution of India

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SHRIKANT JAGESHWAR PATIL AND OTHERS SACHIN S. DESHPANDE (FILED IN COURT), ,MOHAN MANIKRAO ATHAWALE,RAJLAXMI JUNGADE,NIKESH N. DHOKE

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.VITTHAL SHIVRAM LONKAR AND ANOTHER

Case History

  1. 23-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 23-Jun-2026

    —

  3. 05-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Prafulla S. KhubalkarView PDF

    Case Summary: WP 4530/2026 Outcome: Case adjourned. The High Court issued notice to respondents returnable on 15th June 2026. Interim relief granted: parties directed to maintain status quo regarding petitioners' possession of agricultural land pending next hearing. Key Details: Petitioners challenged an Additional Collector's order dated 18.05.2026 under the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, claiming 35+ years cultivating possession of agricultural land in Wardha district. Court permitted service on remaining respondents by private mode and directed maintenance of current possession status. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 05-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/4530/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WP 4530/2026 Outcome: Case adjourned. The High Court issued notice to respondents returnable on 15th June 2026. Interim relief granted: parties directed to maintain status quo regarding petitioners' possession of agricultural land pending next hearing. Key Details: Petitioners challenged an Additional Collector's order dated 18.05.2026 under the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, claiming 35+ years cultivating possession of agricultural land in Wardha district. Court permitted service on remaining respondents by private mode and directed maintenance of current possession status. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case