BHARTI D/O. KAMLESHWAR WASNIK vs THE STATE OF MAH. THR. SECRETARY, SOCIAL JUSTICE AND SPECIAL ASSISTANCE DEPT. AND ORS. — WP/4483/2026
Case under S.c. & S.t. Orders (Amendment) Act Section 226,227. Next hearing: 05th June 2026.
CNR: HCBM040172992026
Filing Number
WP/11747/2026
Filing Date
04-Jun-2026
Registration No
WP/4483/2026
Registration Date
04-Jun-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Prafulla S. Khubalkar
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Prafulla S. Khubalkar
Bench Type
Division
Judicial Branch
Civil
Last updated 06-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.BHARTI D/O. KAMLESHWAR WASNIK
Adv. INDRAJIT GOVINDA MESHRAM
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF MAH. THR. SECRETARY, SOCIAL JUSTICE AND SPECIAL ASSISTANCE DEPT. AND ORS.
-
2.DISTRICT CASTE SCRUTINY VERIFICATION COMMITTEE, GONDIA, THR. CHAIRMAN
-
3.CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, ZILLA PARISHAD, GONDIA
Case History
-
05-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
16-Jun-2026
—
-
05-Jun-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Prafulla S. KhubalkarView PDF
Case Summary: WP/4483/2026 The Nagpur Bench of the Bombay High Court issued a notice-stage order on petitioner Bharti Wasnik's writ petition challenging an order dated 13.05.2026 by the District Caste Scrutiny Verification Committee, Gondia, which invalidated her Schedule Caste ("Mahar") caste claim. The court issued notice to respondents returnable on 25.06.2026 and directed parties to maintain status-quo regarding the petitioner's employment as a Shikshan Sewak until the next hearing to protect her from potential adverse action. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
04-Jun-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WP/4483/2026
Case Summary: WP/4483/2026 The Nagpur Bench of the Bombay High Court issued a notice-stage order on petitioner Bharti Wasnik's writ petition challenging an order dated 13.05.2026 by the District Caste Scrutiny Verification Committee, Gondia, which invalidated her Schedule Caste ("Mahar") caste claim. The court issued notice to respondents returnable on 25.06.2026 and directed parties to maintain status-quo regarding the petitioner's employment as a Shikshan Sewak until the next hearing to protect her from potential adverse action. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts